Laserfiche WebLink
03/12/2020 AC Minutes <br /> will go forward, including Article 4, into a single consent vote. Given the magnitude and <br /> importance of the Town's operating budget, which exceeds $200 million, he suggested that <br /> Town Meeting has a responsibility to demonstrate to Town residents that it has given <br /> Article 4 a careful, separate review. Mr. Padaki concurred. Other members noted that last <br /> year the discussion of the operating budget article was short, and not more controversial than <br /> other articles involving smaller appropriations. <br /> • Publication of all motions in advance would be helpful <br /> • The Town Meeting Members Association listsery could be used for raising questions, for <br /> responses, and discussion. <br /> • Opening the ATM on March 23 does not seem realistic; more preparation time is needed. <br /> Town Meeting members are used to having material presented to them; reading material in <br /> advance will require an adjustment including a delay in the start. <br /> • It could be preferable to plan on two or three town meeting sessions with specifically <br /> identified consent agendas/articles assigned to each. <br /> • It is not clear how this Committee could function during a virtual Town Meeting without <br /> physically being in the same room, particularly if there were an amendment or other <br /> development requiring the Committee to confer and vote. This would also be true for the <br /> Capital Expenditures Committee, the SB and the School Committee. This needs to be <br /> reviewed with Ms. Brown. <br /> • There will likely be financial ramifications, including a possible recession, associated with <br /> this pandemic, which should be addressed sooner than later. <br /> Ms. Kosnoff clarified the following: <br /> • Regarding the postponement of planning articles: If such articles were indefinitely <br /> postponed (IP'ed), a stringent process, involving a two-year delay, would be required to <br /> bring them back to a future town meeting. Under current circumstances, it is preferable to <br /> refer these articles back to the Planning Board or to the SB, which could bring them to a <br /> future Town Meeting on behalf of the original proponent(s). <br /> • The current idea is that the ATM would be broadcast on LexMedia and Town Meeting <br /> members would vote on their phones. <br /> • Over the last three years, there has been no substantive discussion about Article 4 during the <br /> ATM. <br /> • The SB plans to discuss the process at their Monday evening meeting. <br /> Mr. Parker asked for a motion to accept Ms. Brown's proposal with the understanding that he would <br /> forward concerns expressed during the discussion about including Article 4 on a consent agenda, <br /> and he would ask how this Committee would function if it had to take a vote during the ATM. <br /> A motion was made and seconded to accept Ms. Brown's proposal as presented in her document, <br /> with the caveats summarized by Mr. Parker. The motion passed. VOTE: 8-0 <br /> 2020 ATM Financial Articles and Report Planning <br /> Mr. Parker identified the financial articles that still require finalized material for this Committee's <br /> report. He then identified the following articles individually for Ms. Yan to add her vote: <br /> • Article 4: Appropriate FY2021 Operating Budget <br /> • Article 6: Establish Qualifications for Tax Deferrals <br /> • Article 7: Petition General Court to Amend Legislation Regarding Tax Deferrals: <br /> • Article 8: Short Term Rental Impact Fee <br /> 2 <br />