Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2020 <br /> <br />Held on February 12, 2020, in the Select Board Meeting Room, Town Office Building at 7:00pm <br />Present: Robert Creech, Chair; Charles Hornig, Vice-Chair; Robert Peters; Ginna Johnson; Richard Canale and <br />Michael Leon, Associate Planning Board Member. Also, present were Amanda Loomis, Planning Director; Sheila <br />Page, Assistant Planning Director; and Lori Kaufman, Department Assistant <br />Robert Creech, Chair, read the agenda into the record, introduced members of the Planning Board and Planning <br />Department Staff and called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 12, 2020. <br />Development Administration <br />1. Special Permit Modification for 443 Lincoln Street Balanced Housing Development – Hobbs <br />Brook <br />Ms. Johnson was recused from this project. Michael Leon, Associated Member of the Planning Board <br />participated in the review of the Special Permit Modification for 443 Lincoln Street, Hobbs Brook. <br />Present for the public discussion: Jeffrey Rhuda, Symes Development and Permitting, LLC; and Mr. <br />Latham, attorney. <br />Sheila Page provided an overview of the Applicant of Hobbs Brook request for <br />occupancy, in addition to a review of four (4) outstanding items that need to be addressed <br />by the Developer. It was noted that the Town Engineer has reviewed all of the <br />outstanding items and that the Conservation Commission will be requiring review of the <br />project as well. Ms. Page requested clarification from the Planning Board as to how to <br />manage the increase in gross floor area (GFA) differences, whether this can be a field <br />change or require a special permit modification (minor or major). <br /> <br />Mr. Creech requested comments from members of the Planning Board. The following comments were <br />provided: <br /> Robert Peters requested clarification as to what constitutes a field change. <br /> <br />Mr. Rhuda provided a review of what was constructed vs. what was approved. It was noted that <br />the difference in the calculation of impervious area is different if the measurement is from the <br />building wall compared to the roof dripline. Mr. Rhuda stated that the roadway has been <br />constructed and is in binder form. Prior to the top coat being installed, Mr. Rhuda has agreed to <br />trim down the edges of the pavement to what was approved by the Planning Board. <br /> Charles Hornig requested clarification between the differences of a crawl space vs. a full <br />basement. Mr. Hornig stated that what was required and approved by the Building <br />Commissioner is what is supposed to be constructed. Mr. Hornig reviewed what was <br />applied for in the building permit and stated that a special permit modification may be <br />needed. <br /> Richard Canale reviewed the email from Mr. David Fields whom was the prior Planner. <br />Mr. Canale and Mr. Rhuda had a conversation regarding the differences in the recorded <br />decision and what was constructed. <br /> Mr. Hornig requested that the Applicant request a modification to the approved plan. <br /> Michael Leon provided a review as to what a minor modification is compared to what <br />took place in the project. There is a significant increase in GFA that is almost equal to <br />construct another unit. Mr. Leon questioned how lenders would view such differences in <br />what was approved by the Planning Board and what was constructed. <br /> <br />