Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 Minutes for the Meeting of September 25, 2019 <br /> Where does zoning fall in the weighting of the variety of challenges? Mr. Brovitz said <br />while it is not all zoning a good chunk of it is and there needs to be flexibility, amenities, <br />and bumping up of the density. <br /> Has the Town reached out to the Town of Bedford? Acting in a transparent and <br />collaborative way together with Bedford and our residents is important. <br /> Convenience retail being added is a good idea; <br /> Address some mixed use and the future of transit and traffic. <br /> People will need to embrace traffic on the streets and we will have to include extremely <br />strong residential housing and beefed up multimodal transit to qualify for the state <br />monies. <br /> <br />**********************DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION*********************** <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Rangeway Extension (Map 87 lot 37), Definitive Subdivision: <br />Mr. Canale opened the continued public hearing at 7:54 p.m. Mr. Peters is recused from this <br />project. Present were Mr. Grant, attorney Fred Russell, engineer, Suzanne Raymond, applicant <br />(perspective purchaser), Doris Duff owner of the property. Mr. Grant provided a detailed history <br />of the property, which is included in the application. This is for a road improvement plan to <br />provide frontage for this lot on a private way. <br />Mr. Russell presented the changes to the plan which included the road with an inconsistent width <br />of 14 to 16 feet to be extended 150 feet to create frontage for this lot with a T- turnaround instead <br />of a cul-de-sac. The path will be relocated to allow pedestrian access to the Town of Lexington <br />conservation land and will enhance the landscape buffer zone along the street and between the <br />most affected abutter at #27. The applicant’s proposal is to install three underground infiltration <br />systems, utilities, and flatten out the slope from 14% to 10% without impacting any abutters. The <br />increase of the easement for the turnaround is to include snow storage. <br />Individual Board Comments: <br /> There was concern with the waiver for the wall height and specifics of the retaining wall <br />since it will need repairs? Mr. Russell said the retaining wall is four feet higher than the <br />street to provide protection and provide as a guardrail and the construction will be <br />concrete block. The abutters on Drummer Boy will see a 10 foot high 30 foot long <br />concrete wall in an area that used to be woodland. What will be done to mitigate in <br />plantings to screen this wall? The condo owners will not see it. Did you reach out to <br /> <br />