Laserfiche WebLink
- People with disabilities have problems traveling over uneven surfaces, as do <br />elderly citizens and young mothers with strollers. There is an important <br />“fatigue factor’ associated with traveling over bricks for those with mobility <br />issues. <br />- Segmented discrete pavers have lots of seams and irregularities which cause <br />tripping hazards for all. <br />- Vibration issues cause spasticity, pain, loss of balance and disturbances of <br />correct positional seating. <br />- Pathways that are not smooth are almost impassable for those with <br />neurological disorders and/or visual issues. <br />- The variegation in brick creates depth perception issues and “neurological <br />noise” issues. <br /> Commission on Disability originally proposed the use of concrete with bricks on the <br />sides for decorative edge treatment because it is a safer and smoother approach to <br />sidewalks. <br />- This type of sidewalk also helps people with visual, sensory and neurological <br />problems since it offers way-finding features. Many neighboring towns have <br />already adopted this choice. <br />- This is in accordance with resolution passed in Town Meeting in 2015 as <br />Article 42: “To provide a welcoming and comfortable experience for <br />individuals of all abilities, the Town will endeavor at all times to use smooth, <br />safe and aesthetically appropriate materials when constructing sidewalks and <br />other passageways on town-owned walkways. Bricks and other small discrete <br />pavers may be used as decorative edge treatments, but shall always be <br />installed to create the smoothest surface possible, ensuring safety for <br />citizens who have trouble traversing uneven surfaces.” <br /> <br /> Commission on Disability has concerns about the proposed wire-cut brick sidewalks: <br />- We have never seen “one done right” in our climate. <br />- We question smoothness claims. It defies logic that segmented pavers are <br />smoother than surfaces with fewer seams. <br />- Even if the claims of superior smoothness can be substantiated, it does not <br />answer all of our concerns anyway, such as depth perception and <br />neurological noise due to variegation. <br />- We question the high cost of the proposed sidewalks, asking citizens with <br />disabilities to pay taxes on what they cannot use safely. <br />- We worry about maintenance in our climate. Who will monitor this? Other <br />places like Boston replace “tipped bricks’ with patches. <br />- The demographics of Lexington are changing as the percentage of elders is <br />increasing. The Council on Aging was not part of the Ad Hoc Streetscape <br />Committee. <br /> Commission on Disability has special concerns about the proposed brick curb cuts for <br />crosswalks. We need concrete ramps with federal yellow rumble strips. <br /> <br />