Laserfiche WebLink
December 3, 1957 <br /> A sleeting of the historic Districts Co mission was held. <br /> Tuesday evening, Dec. 3s 1957 at 7s30 P.M. in the Selectmen's <br /> Room on the application for a, certificate of appropriateness <br /> of the She in-t.'ill.Jams Paint for proposed p:inting and <br /> erection of a sign at 1841 Mass. Ave.taxington which is <br /> within the Battle Green Dic:trict. Mr. Parsons presided in <br /> Tyr. Davis' absence. Present also were Commissioners Tagl.or <br /> and Kettell and Alternates Howard and Mrs,kerriam. <br /> Mr, C.S104ells of 25 Brookline Ave.Boston was present <br /> frai the Sherwin-Williams people in the absence of Nr*Belcastro <br /> who was at a meeting in Chicago. Nor. Wells had only learned <br /> of this meeting about 5.00 o'clock this afternoon. <br /> Mr. Pareon lead the notice and explained briefly to Mr.we'le <br /> the Act. <br /> Mr. wells moke of the high duality of their company and said <br /> they had a 3 and 2 yr. ( 5 yr. total) lease from Nr.Scott. <br /> Each store operates by itself and �4p1C0.00 is deposited only <br /> ro credit of the local company and, Mr. Beleastro is Local <br /> manager and responsible for company here. <br /> Mr. Wells said paint could be changed but the sign bothered <br /> then. First sign was too eoi<'; for local ordinance and another <br /> one( now up) was ordered which, is their usual sign--creasy <br /> background, covering entire top of store with maroon lettering® <br /> Said sign cost t$200.00( baked poreelein) and about �15O.00 to <br /> erect. , <br /> He asked why when the permit for siZn was given out, why <br /> there was not a note on it saying this had been approved <br /> by the Historic Districts Commission? <br /> They knew nothing from the landlord he said about our <br /> Commission. <br /> He would like to have a length of time ( 5 yrs. ) on sign so <br /> that some of the expense could be absorbed. Then sign could <br /> be changed, <br /> l'Ir.4ettell said it was very hard to have 9, standard on signs. <br /> It was decided to discuss this at n,act week's hearinz,( dec.1.0th) <br /> ai-d decide on anolher date with the Sherwin-Williams people, <br /> when Ur.Belcastro would be back( which will be night of Dec.14 ) <br /> Mr.slsgells wanted this meeting the first of January so he could <br /> be .resent as he is going away Deo.13th, However, running <br /> this until there is too close to the 60 day .limit. <br /> This hearing ad;ourned about 8:20 P.N. Considerable discussion <br /> was had and it was decided to discuss this Dec.10th and hold <br /> Dec. 17th( Tuesday) for a possible date for this next hearing. <br />