|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1976-04-22
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Historic Districts Commission-HDC
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
1976-04-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2019 9:47:00 AM
Creation date
8/13/2012 8:03:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - HDC - Historic District Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ' ~ • <br /> HISTORIC DISTRICTS CObiM2SSI0N <br /> April 22, 1976 <br /> A meeting of the Historic Districts Commission was held on Thursday, <br /> April 22, 1976, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room. Present were Commissioners <br /> Wilbur M. Jaquith, Chairman; Georgia H. Williams, Secretary; S. Lawrence <br /> Whipple; and Associate Commissioners Oliver F. Hopper who was appointed to <br /> serve for Commissioner Thomas J. Holzbog, and Amalia G. Samoylenko, who was <br /> appointed to fill the vacancy. <br /> A hearing was held at 8:35 P.M. on the application of the Town of <br /> Lexington for a Certificate with respect to the erection of a new flagpole <br /> on the Battle Green, which is within the Battle Green District. Present <br /> were Emanuele Coscia, Acting Director of Public Works, and Peter Chalpin, <br /> Senior Engineer, representing the Town; Richard Michelson, President, and <br /> Tony Mancini,. Clerk of the Bicentennial Corporation; Elizabeth Reinhardt, <br /> Chairman, and Anne Grady of the Historical Commission; Roland Greeley, <br /> President of the Lexington Historical Society; biarjorie Weerts of 1906 <br /> Massachusetts Avenue; and Martin Gilman. Also included in the application <br /> was a request for two commemorative plaques, one on the crosstree and one <br /> at the base of the flagpole. <br /> The Selectmen have signed a contract with B. A. Larson Co. of Bedford <br /> for a new flagpole which will be an exact replica of the existing except <br /> not of wood and the bottom will not be tapered but cylindrical. The first <br /> section will be 22" in diameter and a steel tube about 14' in the ground. <br /> The flagpole will be 125' in height with 95' total at the base and a 44 1/2' <br /> section on top and will taper from 12 3/4" to 8 5/8" at the top. If can <br /> remove the existing pole which is encased in concrete, the new flagpole will <br /> be installed in the same location as the existing; if cannot remove, the new <br /> one will be located 15' behind- the existing pole. It is planned to remove <br /> the trestle tree and crate it and ship to New York to be duplicated in steel. <br /> It is hoped that the legend on the metal can be reused but will have profes- <br /> sionally redone if necessary. The base of the new flagpole may or may not <br /> be painted green, and the balance of the flagpole will be painted white <br /> amtone polymerice urethane finish. The-trestletree light will be-eliminated <br /> and lights will be put on poles on the Avenue and on Bedford Street as the <br /> effect is supposed to be superior. The halyard will be nylon rope with <br /> steel cable and vinyl coated. <br /> Bowlander in California who made the existing pole was contacted about <br /> making a replacement flagpole, and the two men who made the existing pole <br /> refused to make a new pole this size. Reynolds and Alcoa would not quote on <br /> the project, and no company is interested in making a pole of this size. <br /> Discussion followed on fiberglas flagpoles, but there is some question asto <br /> whether one this height would be satisfactory. <br /> For purposes of record Mr. Jaquith stated: <br /> 1. totally inappropriate <br /> 2. is appropriate <br /> 3. inappropriate but can be approved under hardship clause. <br /> Discussion followed on color and what could be done if the Commission <br /> decided steel not appropriate as wood used in 1700s, 1800s, and early 1900. <br /> A1r. Greeley noted that a flagpole of that size would have been inappropriate <br /> in 1775. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.