|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1976-01-28
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Historic Districts Commission-HDC
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
1976-01-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2019 9:47:00 AM
Creation date
8/13/2012 8:02:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - HDC - Historic District Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> r . ~ ` <br /> HISTORIC DISTRICTS C061MISSION <br /> January 28, 1976 <br /> A meeting of the Historic Districts Commission was held on Wednesday, <br /> January 28, 1976, in the Selectmens Meeting Room. Present were Commissioners <br /> Wilbur b1. Jaquith, Chairman; Georgia H. Williams, Secretary; Thomas J. <br /> Holzbog, Donald J. Shaw; and Associate Commissioner Oliver F. Hooper who was <br /> appointed to serve for S. Lawrence Whipple. <br /> Representing Brigham's were Mr. Henderson and Mr. Anthony Dedousis and <br /> representing Stop & Shop (Athens Realty Trust) were Robert Ross and Jack <br /> McCarthy. <br /> It was stated that the Building Department had issued a Permit to change <br /> the Buttrick's sign which had previously been on the fascia board of the <br /> store. Mr. Henderson said that he was not aware that Brigham's had to come <br /> before this Commission. Mr. Jaquith said that you know that we turned down <br /> the sign proposed for your store in the Center of Lexington. <br /> Mr. Henderson said, "tell us what you would like to see". Mr. Jaquith <br /> said that the Commission would like to see the sign removed and a somewhat <br /> different sign erected. Mr. Henderson said that Harold Chalfin of Back Bay <br /> Sign Company had been told by the Building Department that this store was not <br /> in a Historic District. The Building Department then issued a Permit for the <br /> installation of this sign. Mr. Henderson said that our identification is our <br /> logo and that he cannot go back to the company and justify expenditure of <br /> $800-$1000 for this sign. Mr. Jaquith said that, knowing our feeling for the <br /> proposed sign for Massachusetts Avenue,-you should have contacted the Com- <br /> mission re the Bedford Street Store. Mr. Henderson's answer was that the <br /> Building Department told Mr. Chalfin's secretary that it was not necessary as <br /> the store was not in a Historic District.. Mr. Jaquith said that you got the <br /> wrong information and that it has not been possible to pin down who gave you <br /> the information. He added that you have a sign that the Commission feels is <br /> inappropriate - the most objectionable section is the red, white, and blue <br /> garland. <br /> Mr. Henderson said that replacing this sign would be difficult to "sell" <br /> to his company unless bargaining on the Massachusetts Avenue sign is done. <br /> Pir. Dedousis said that they spent a great deal of money for the sign. Mr. <br /> Henderson said that the most important part is the word "Brigham's" in their <br /> logo form. Mr. Jaquith said that the Commission does not like the blocking <br /> of the letters. Mr. Hooper said that the objection is not nedessarily the <br /> logo but the letters. Mr. Holzbog said that the Commission's responsibility <br /> is to the Town and our attempt is to improve signs, buildings, etc. <br /> Mr. Henderson said that there are many different types of signs in that <br /> shopping area - different types of lettering, colors, and logos. He said that <br /> the logo is the one thing that is important to Brigham's. He added that all <br /> he wanted if the availability to use the logo on both stores. Mr. Jaquith <br /> said that;. when he first became a member of the Commission, no logos were <br /> allowed at all. He stated that the Commission has allowed some logos when <br /> the Commission felt that they are in good taste for the Town of Lexington. He <br /> said that unforunately we do not feel that this logo is appropriate. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.