Laserfiche WebLink
April ; 5, 1961 <br />" The i?istcric Districts ;amr«i:reion met tt the time cnd place <br />Sled in the public notice of the hering on the appi.lcstion of <br />Brigidls t:hurch f(sr K certifi.ce:ta of appropriateness to move <br />a garage at the rear of the premises at 977 Massachusetts Avenue, <br />which la within the battle Green Di strict. <br />P resent were Donald R. Grant Chair n Bd 1n B. worth <br />Cyrus wood„ and Associate Mortars Arnold Y. deuv..rd and Ralph A. Bxzr n k . <br />On motion weds and duly seconded, it vas unanimously VOTL D that <br />Edwin B. `n'ort`aeo, Jr., be deslgnoted to prep,p're the minutes of the <br />meeting in vies of the 7Abaince of the secr ry. <br />The chairmen read the letter of ar pllcstion. bpper,:ring in behalf <br />of the church was $ r. Pet-le Monc: etti 4 ' t-. Aonc4.etti 3c Hoes, M6 30h0. <br />Mr. Roncheatti ;ft with tb•e cows ! sicn a sli,.atc:h .T.howini, the location <br />of t.hs gabs ;s. ; uea,stio:.is were e:ca.:ed by various tte b rs of the commissin. <br />The he'r:ng e.s adjourned et 1:15 P. M. <br />On motion made and duly seCV'nded, it was unanimously VOTED to grant <br />to Saint Brigid's Church a ?emit for Removal with reapect tr the <br />relocation o: an existing +344 air urage in the rear oil' trxec present <br />rectory at 1977 Mi.saschusetts Avenue, Lexington. <br />Also ,restart} at the meeting was Mr. Andrew A. LBi gh on. when <br />asked, Mr. :,,,ei ghton str =ted ttu.t tie had no o.:,Jtietion V: the change in <br />ghat eor3.;.s.oa t.iott of the membrshil of the commission since the original <br />her: ring of April 11, 1961. <br />P'u.rthet.r discussion was head with Mr. Andrew A. `..c; ht n !. °a;aa< =zing <br />on behalf or H. M. Lawrence Eiardwtre. Inc., rt 1777 M.s ssaachus©tts <br />Avenue, es to the model of the proposed neu sign for that location <br />Which wee originally eresented to the smrri. =asion at the original <br />heeri.ng { on Agri':. 11, 1965: , and as to the as:a:.c1md prepo�sri eubbzzitted <br />et thi:: time. <br />After considerable discussion motion was mAde and duly seconded,, <br />the 'commission determine that the erection and ei splay of oithr <br />proposed ::inn sirs .L d be inappropriate within the meaning of the at <br />astrhlis.' ^,ing and defiling the duties of the coaziaalon, that the <br />commisian determine thet the failure to approver the g;apiics.tion <br />'sould not involve a s thstant1 a hardship to the Es;ypTi cent, er.r.ci that the <br />commission P:zrt1'-!r det -rmine that aproval of tre appAicse tlon coaid <br />be made without s • bstrsrttia`: detriment to or , zrng ion from the <br />uses of the act, <br />kurther discussion ;gas had as to th.ca any hist,:ri.cai <br />a cue or algnificahce or the building to ; Aida it i z proposed to attach <br />ai new Sign, ass to the general deli ;.rr, arrangement, texture, me tcri al <br />ri3 coi: of the features of the sf rz' i.n::iaot i' the me u <br />lettering, and as tai the relation of those factors to A.mil .r, tutors <br />of oared bui,ld.i,ngr, structures u.d signs in tn«a immediate aurrux:di=;g. ;, <br />especially the other buildings, structures and signs for which the <br />41 1ooaatr.is =.store has dreaa.dy is sued certificates of apbropri -0teness in the <br />brittle Freer, Distri and within view of the premiss z%.d sign location <br />in ':aest1on. <br />