|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1985-04-10
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-04-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:41:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1985 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was <br />called to order at 7:11 p.m. by the Chairman Mrs. Smith with members Cripps, <br />Flemings, Sorensen, Uhrig and Planning Director Bowyer present. Four members of <br />the Junior Class of Lexington High School, Mssrs. Allen, Gaudet, Hagopian and <br />Sandy, who were designated as members of the Planning Board for Student Govern- <br />ment Day, were also present. <br />ARTICLES FOR 1985 TOWN MEETING <br />112. Article 21, RD, Woburn Street: Peter Kelley and Richard Perry of Woodhaven <br />Realty and Landscape Architect, Gary Larson were present to show a revised site <br />plan to the Board. Six residents of the area were also present. <br />Mr. Kelley stated there were 3 principal commitments: 1) the provision of afford- <br />able housing for 50% of the units, 2) a system to monitor the development so <br />those units remain affordable in the future and 3) granting a full conservation <br />easement to the Town over the wetlands. Mr. Larson showed how the interior drive <br />had been relocated away from the property lines and how a buffer strip with <br />screening and planting had been provided for along the side lot lines adjacent to <br />two abutting houses and along Woburn Street. On the suggestion of the Fire <br />Chief, steps leading to the buildings in the upper section of the site had been <br />replaced by ramps to make access easier for emergency vehicles. <br />In response to a question from Mrs. Flemings, Mr. Kelley said the developer would <br />make a legal committment through the site development and use plan to maintain <br />the unit for rental housing. Any change to another form of ownership would <br />require action of a subsequent Town Meeting. <br />Mr. Sorensen mentioned a 1980 hydrologic report that said no dwellings should be <br />located below elevation 200. Mr. Larson said no finished floor levels were below <br />elevation 200 and that would comply with the Zoning By -Law. There was some <br />construction, such as foundations, below elevation 200. He also noted that the <br />elevation 200 was an artificial target because the 100 year flood elevation was <br />well below that, around 195. In response to Mr. Sorensen's question about grad- <br />ing on this steep site, Mr. Larson said that all of the road and all of the <br />parking lot have slopes of less than 5%. <br />In an informal poll of the Board, Mrs. Smith said she had no reason not to sup- <br />port the proposal. Larson had done a good site analysis and the proposed design <br />treated a very difficult site well; the issues of screening of the neighborhood <br />and abutting property had been dealt with; there was much need of rental housing <br />and 50% of the housing units would be in the affordable category. Mrs. Uhrig <br />said her concern had been that the site plan conform with what the Planning Board <br />proposed in Article 11, Planned Residential Development. She understood that the <br />development technically was subject to last year's RD District requirements but <br />she did not feel comfortable in supporting a proposal that would conflict with <br />what the Planning Board was recommending. As it now appears that the site plan <br />will conform with Article 11, she is inclined to support the proposal. <br />Mr. Sorensen said it was a very difficult site which will require too much grad- <br />ing to develop; he is opposed. Mrs. Flemings was interested in the amount of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.