|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1985-04-01
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-04-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:41:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 1, 1985 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was <br />called to order at 7:10 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Cripps, <br />Flemings, Sorensen, Uhrig, Planning Director Bowyer, and Assistant Planner Delori <br />present. <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND: <br />97. Ridge Estates III, off East Emerson Road, Theodore Freeman; PUBLIC HEARING: <br />At 7:10 p.m. the Chairman opened the public hearing on the application for a <br />definitive subdivison plan and concurrently the application for a special permit <br />for a conventional subdivision entitled Ridge Estates III. Representing the <br />applicants were Theodore Freeman, Attorney Dennis Lowe and Carl Bowles of Hayes <br />Engineering. <br />Atorney Dennis Lowe said there would be six house lots constisting of five new <br />lots and lot 37 from the 'Ridge Estates II Subdivision which would be redesignated <br />as lot 1 of the Ridge Estates III Subdivision. All lots complied with the front- <br />age, area and lot circle requirements. <br />Mr. Bowles presented a plan showing an alternate road profile with a maximum <br />grade of 10% If that was to the Board's satisfaction, a waiver would be reques- <br />ted from the 8% maximum slope for a street. Mr. Freeman commented that while a <br />plan for an 8% grade of the road had been submitted, they preferred a 10% slope. <br />He said the land was highly treed and the 8% grade would devastate the land and <br />the tree cover. He asked the Board to consider changing to a 10% slope. In <br />response to a question from Mr. Sorensen, Mr. Bowles pointed out that the cut for <br />the road varied from 6 feet to 14-17 feet. It would be somewhat less with a 10% <br />slope. <br />The Board was in receipt of a letter from Town Engineer Francis Fields to Health <br />Director George Smith, dated March 29, 1985, which said that the plan met en- <br />gineering specifications and that the drainage at the time seemed to be adequate. <br />That will be reviewed further when drainage calculations are submitted. <br />Mrs. Smith read into the record a letter dated March 29, 1985 from Stephen Colan- <br />gelo of 172 East Emerson Road, the owner of lot 38 in the Ridge Estates II Subdi- <br />vision which abuts the proposed subdivision. Colangelo said that he had examined <br />the plan and found it to be inaccurate in that it shows a 25 foot slope easement <br />running parallel to the northeast property line of lot 38. That slope easement <br />does not exist. Mr. Freeman was granted a 3 foot easement for tree removal from <br />lot 38. Colangelo's letter said that in recent days Mr. Freeman started excava- <br />ting for the roadway and Colangelo considered that, in so doing, he was trespas- <br />sing on lot 38 because the work was being done beyond the 3 foot tree removal <br />easement. Mr. Bowyer showed the Board four photographs, which Colangelo had <br />furnished, showing the construction of the road appears to have begun. <br />Mrs. Flemings questioned whether construction was supposed to start before a <br />subdivision had been approved or even before the public hearing on the proposed <br />plan was held. Mr. Freeman answered that construction was really the grading of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.