|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1985-03-16
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-03-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:41:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 16, 1985 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in room G-1, Town Offices, was <br />called to order at 9:16 a.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Cripps, <br />Flemings, Sorensen and Planning Director Bowyer present. Mrs. Uhrig joined the <br />meeting during the discussion of Article 15. <br />ARTICLES FOR 1985 TOWN MEETING <br />64. Article 12, Conversion of One Famiy Dwelling: The Board reviewed a draft of <br />the report dated March 13, 1985. It was agreed to add language at the beginning <br />to state the Planning Board's objective more clearly and to emphasize the protec- <br />tion to be afforded single family neighborhoods from the amount of conversion now <br />permitted by Section 5.3. Other editorial changes were agreed to. <br />65. Article 15, Parking Space Elevations: David Williams, Angela Frick and <br />Joyce Miller of the Conservation Commission were present to request that the <br />Planning Board expand the language to prohibit any parking in an area currently <br />designated as within a 100 -year flood area. The wording of the article prevents <br />the construction of required parking spaces at an elevation below the 100 -year <br />flood level but would permit the construction of extra (non -required) parking <br />below the 100 -year flood elevation and would permit the construction of required <br />parking spaces if the area is filled to an elevation higher than the 100 -year <br />flood elevation. <br />Mrs. Smith and Mr. Bowyer pointed out that the proposed amendment would be in the <br />parking section of the Zoning By -Law and would draw its justification from zoning <br />and the provision of off-street parking. While the complete prohibition of any <br />parking in an area of a 100 -year flood elevation may be desirable for environ- <br />mental reasons, it would not be easy to justify that action for off-street park- <br />ing -zoning reasons, which are the subject of Article 15. It was agreed that the <br />environmental objectives would be better achieved through Article 9, the Conser- <br />vation Commission's proposed amendments to the Town's Wetland Protection By -Law. <br />66. Article 16, Congregate Living Facility: The Board reaffirmed its approach -- <br />new construction of congregate living facilities, including additions to existing <br />buildings, would be by Town Meeting action only. The conversion of an existing <br />dwelling, without any addition, would be the only type of congregate living <br />facility permitted in the RO or RS district and that would require a special <br />permit from the Board of Appeals. <br />67. Article 17, Health Hazards: It was agreed to change one paragraph in the <br />draft report. <br />68. Article 18, CD, Concord Avenue: In a poll of the Board, four members are in <br />favor of the amendment. Mr. Sorensen is opposed because he believes the screen- <br />ing is inadequate and the need for additional office space in town has not been <br />justified. The members in favor said the report should cite the design of the <br />proposal, the restrictions limiting the development to small offices, and the <br />traffic capacity of the intersection, which is adequate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.