Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 1985 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was <br />called to order at 7:35 p.m., by the Chairman Mrs. Smith, with members Cripps, <br />Flemings, Sorensen, Uhrig, and Planning Director Bowyer present. <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />16. Pine Meadows Estates, Preliminary Plan: The Board reviewed a draft of a <br />decision on the preliminary subdivision plan. Some editorial changes were made. <br />On the motion of Mrs. Uhrig, seconded by Mrs. Flemings, it was voted unanimously <br />to disapprove the preliminary plan for the proposed subdivision for the reasons <br />set forth in the "Decision on Pine Meadows Estates Preliminary Subdivision Plan" <br />as amended. Mrs. Smith commented that a development of this size should submit <br />more information so that the impact of the development can be ascertained. <br />ARTICLES FOR 1985 TOWN MEETING <br />17. Hearing Schedule: Mr. Bowyer reported that a provision of Chapter 40A <br />requires that the Planning Board hold a hearing within 65 days from the time it <br />is notified by the Board of Selectmen of receipt of a petition to amend the <br />Zoning By -Law. That means the three hearings for South Lexington night, sched- <br />uled for March 11, would violate that provision of the statute. It was agreed to <br />' hold those hearings on February 19. <br />18. Article D. Conversion of One -Family Dwelling: The Board agreed to a change <br />in the wording in 5.3.2a 4) to insert the words floor area used for residential <br />purposes to clarify that a building not used for residential purposes as of <br />January 1, 1983 could not qualify for conversion. <br />19. Article B, Planned Residential Development: Jacquelyn Davison, Frank and <br />Louise Kava, Marian Reilly and Alan Wade of the South Lexington Civic Association <br />were present to request that the Planning Board prohibit the construction of <br />nursing homes and congregate living facilities in single family residential <br />districts by a special permit. They advocated that those types of developments <br />should require a rezoning to be voted on by Town Meeting. They pointed out that <br />two major developments were proposed on either side of Waltham Street near the <br />Waltham City line. New developments of this type for senior citizens will be <br />large structures that will look like apartment buildings or institutional build- <br />ings. Their potential impact on single family neighborhoods means that they <br />should be voted upon by the Town Meeting. <br />Mrs. Smith responded that the Board was aware of that concern. In its proposed <br />revision of the residential development regulations, it proposes to employ a <br />density standard and have criteria about the appearance of those types of devel- <br />opments so they would be complimentary to single family neighborhoods. <br />In further discussion of the issue of flexible development standards and the use <br />of "qualitative" criteria, a poll of the Board showed that four members favored <br />greater use of qualitative criteria; Mr. Sorensen did not and thought the regula- <br />tion should be based on numerical standards. <br />