Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MAY 18, 1983 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-7, Town Offices, was <br />called to order at 7:42 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Flemings, <br />Nichols, Uhrig and Planning Director Bowyer present. Mr. Sorensen was absent as he <br />was out of town on business. <br />APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br />99. 124 Spring Street, Beal Company; SPS: Irwin Barkan, Vice President of the Beal <br />Company, Norman Abend, Traffic Engineer, and Gary Larson, Landscape Architect, were <br />present. Mr. Barkan explained that the additional 100 parking spaces, in excess of <br />the ratio of 3.5 parking spaces/1000 square feet of gross floor area, were because <br />the prospective tenant insisted upon spaces for conferences held several times dur- <br />ing the year. Mr. Larson commented that this occasional overflow parking need would <br />be difficult to accommodate by parking on the shoulders of the driveways because <br />there are steep slopes adjacent to many sections of the driveways. <br />Mr. Larson explained that the system of driveways on the northeast side of the park- <br />ing garage was really part of the circulation system of the garage. There are no <br />interior ramps in the garage and to change from one level to another requires use of <br />the exterior drives. Mr. Barkan said they had not previously investigated the use <br />of compact parking spaces in the garage but would now do so with the objective of <br />relocating as many open air spaces into the garage as possible. Norman Abend stated <br />that a parking space width of 8'-9 feet is sufficient for all -day parking for either <br />standard or compact sized automobiles. He suggested an average space width of 8.75 <br />feet gives a flexible arrangement. <br />' Mr. Barkan said they had not really studied the additional 100 foot buffer strip <br />recommended by the Planning Board. There was discussion about conservation restric- <br />tions, a walking easement, and protection of the Davis property at 112 Spring <br />Street. Barkan agreed to submit a plan of the entire site showing all the proposed <br />restrictions, easements and setback lines. <br />Mr. Bowyer reported on a meeting with Norman Abend on the methodology issues raised <br />in the Planning Board's May 11 report. For "trip generation," Abend relied on case <br />studies of other suburban developments in eastern Massachusetts and southern New <br />Hampshire; the Planning Department staff relies on the trip generation manual pre- <br />pared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. On the effect of other addi- <br />tional development on the intersections in the area, Mr. Abend described these as <br />general area wide traffic issues and did not consider it appropriate, as the consul- <br />tant for the Beal Company, to undertake studies of the effects of other develop- <br />ments. <br />The other issue dealt with a decline in the "level of service" at intersections. The <br />Spring Street-Marrett Road intersection is the only one which declines to level of <br />service "D". Mr. Abend pointed out that decline results from a change of a few per- <br />centage points in the volume/capacity ratio, based on existing conditions. By the <br />simple act of placing paint lines to create a left turn lane, that intersection <br />could be restored to level of service "C", using accepted traffic engineering <br />calculations. <br />As for a financial contribution by the developer toward needed traffic and safety <br />(sidewalk) improvements off the site, Mr. Barkan emphasized the Beal Company did not <br />consider it their place to pay for traffic improvements in the area. He has agreed <br />to make a contribution to a fund to be set up by the Town for improvements. The <br />