Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 1983 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was <br />called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Vice Chairman Nichols, with members Sandy, Sorensen, <br />Uhrig and Planning Director Bowyer present. Chairman Smith was absent. <br />1. APPLICATIONS TO BOARD OF APPEALS <br />The Board continued its discussion of cases to be heard by the Board of Appeals on <br />January 6, 1983. <br />959 Waltham Street, Elks Lodge: SP, temporary use of trailers: Mr. Bowyer re- <br />ported that the Elks Lodge had sought permission for the use of a part of their <br />parking lot through February 28, 1983 for six trailers used in conjunction with <br />the distribution of telephone directories. On the motion of Mrs. Uhrig, seconded <br />by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted 4-0 to make no recommendation. <br />17 Hartwell Avenue, Kendall Company: SP, storage shed for solvent wastes: The <br />Board reviewed a memorandum from Fire Chief John Bergeron to the Board of <br />Appeals, dated 1/3/83, recommending that the special permit be approved but <br />subject to various restrictions on construction. On the motion of Mr. Sandy, <br />seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted 3-0, with Mrs. Uhrig abstaining, to recom- <br />mend that the special permit be granted with the conditions recommended by the <br />Fire Chief. <br />Mr. Sandy suggested that the staff and the Fire Chief report on how hazardous <br />materials are handled in the Town, what state and federal agencies regulate the <br />use of toxic materials, do they regulate adequately, and who is assuring that the <br />electronic industries within the Town are run in a safe manner. He noted that <br />Line 10.1 of Table 1, which prohibits various hazardous is very general and needs <br />to be improved. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, POLICIES <br />2. Accessory Apartments, Issues Analysis: Chairman Steven Clark, Cornelius Cronin, <br />and Margaret Rawls of the Accessory Apartments Committee were present for continua- <br />tion of the review of the Issues Analysis paper, dated December 21, 1982, and the <br />revised recommendation of the Accessory Apartments Committee as of December 30, 1982. <br />Mr. Sandy objected to the elimination, in the latest committee draft, of the restric- <br />tion on increases in floor space to 10% for a five year period prior to the issuance <br />of a permit for an accessory apartment. After discussion, the Board and the Commit- <br />tee agreed the provision should be restored. <br />Mrs. Nichols suggested that a requirement be added that accessory apartments be per- <br />mitted only on accepted streets. There was discussion about permitting accessory <br />apartments on unaccepted streets in the same manner as'an application for a new house <br />on an unaccepted street. The Board agreed not to include a requirement on the status <br />of the street because it would further complicate an already complex subject. <br />One major issue is whether a permit for an accessory apartment may be obtained "by <br />right" from the Building Commissioner or whether a special permit should be granted <br />by the Board of Appeals. Mrs. Rawls restated the Committee's conviction that the <br />SET <br />