Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />n <br />1 <br />PLANNING BOARD MEETING <br />May 5, 1980 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was called to order at 7:40 p.m. <br />by the Chairman Dr. Friedman with members Sorensen, Wheaton, Nichols, Sandy, <br />Planning Director Bowyer and Administrative Clerk Mrs. Snow present. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />The minutes of the Planning Board meeting on April 28, 1980, were corrected <br />and then approved unanimously. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Trinity Realty Trust: The Board reviewed a draft report on the petition for <br />a variance on frontage requirements for the Trinity Covenant Church property <br />at Clematis Road. The report was amended and was unanimously approved as <br />amended. <br />A draft report on the petition of Trinity Covenant Estates for a special <br />permit for a cluster development at Clematis Road, was reviewed, amended, <br />and was unanimously approved as amended. <br />Tektronix, Inc.: A draft report on the Tektronix Inc. petition for an SPS <br />for expansion of existing facilities and parking at Bedford Street and <br />Hartwell Avenue was reviewed, amended and was unanimously approved as <br />amended. <br />FORM A APPLICATIONS <br />#9 and #11 North Hancock Street, A80-3: A plan previously submitted with <br />Application Form A80-3, and endorsed by the Planning Board on March 24, 1980, <br />showing division of a lot with two dwellings at #9 and 911 North Hancock <br />Street, was reviewed. The applicant requested re -endorsement of the plan <br />because the location of paved driveway areas was added to the plan subsequent <br />to the March 24 action. The Board voted that because of the alteration, the <br />original plan will be retained in the Planning Office until the Board's en- <br />dorsement has been obliterated. If this procedure is not followed, the plan <br />will be considered void and will be so marked. The Board voted 4 - 0 to <br />rescind the endorsement dated March 24, 1980, of the plan submitted with <br />Application FormA80-3, because the plan had been altered after being signed. <br />Mrs. Wheaton abstained because she was absent at the time of initial endorse- <br />ment. <br />Potter Pond, A80-7: The Board reviewed a plan submitted with Application <br />Form A80-7, showing the site of the Potter Pond condominium development at <br />Concord Avenue and Walnut Street. The plan showed a division of the site <br />to correspond to three phases of const uction. William Smith, the developer, <br />and Attorney Malm explained the constr ction phasing. It was noted that areas <br />I and II had sufficient frontage on Wa nut Street, but that area III did not <br />comply with frontage requirements. Mr. Smith explained that Lot A, now under <br />option to purchase, would comply with that requirement. <br />