Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />Notes_ takers at the public hearing on February 11, 1970 <br />At 7:30 'p,m. on February 11, 1970, a public hearing was hold by the plashing <br />Board concerning a petition to amend the Zoning By -Law to establish a conservancy <br />zone, specifically an area northeasterly side of Btford St. bounded by Grove St. <br />on the northeast, the Northern Circumferential Highway (lite. 128) on the southeast, <br />Bedford St. on the southwest and Winter St. on the northwest at or below 130 ms1. <br />Chairman Lund asked the proponent, Dr. Manfred Friedman, to present the proposal. <br />first Dr. Friedman cuoted Walter Lipman and then suggested the -t with this proposal <br />the citizens hope to take a step in the solution of some problems and reviewed <br />the proposal as it is written, covering the general objectives, permitted uses, <br />uses by special permit from Soard of Appeals and the procedure by which a permit <br />is obtained. Dr. Friedman showed a slide indicating the area involved and explained <br />that the article was prepared by a legal staff after reviewing similar articles <br />from other towns. He remarked that Lexington has only two typgs of zones at the <br />present time, commercial and residence. He stated that it was the intent to put <br />an; additional paragraph and include Great Meadows but they did not think this <br />was the timet <br />Postcards were scant to residents asking if they would be in favor or against such <br />an article, Of the cards returned, its were in favor, 1 opposed and 1, no opinion. <br />These curds were submitted to the Planning Board. <br />Someone from precinct 1 asked 1) if it turas the intent to later add other districts, <br />2) to See. 4 wouldn't the extent of surveying incur undue costs and 3) re. S c. 1, <br />are you allowed by law to protect people against what the article tries to Protect <br />them against? <br />Dr. F. replied that if passed, they are hoping the planning Board will survey. <br />To No. a Dr. F. said he thinks the 2 ft. -co teur is what the Toren ro,�.uires. He <br />was not sure of answer to No. 3. <br />Mr. Wathea-Duran remarked the district proposed is different in kind from other <br />zones. What is being proposed have will overlap .with other distticts and areas <br />may be part commercial and part of this Wetlands diattict. <br />Dr. F. -requirements of basic zone. <br />Wathen Duma suggested areas could be basic zoning and this zoning. <br />Dr. Friedman said they had considered it being 37 or 38 in the ;Zoning By -Law, <br />Wathen-+Dunn asked if it would be split up. <br />Mr. Lund suggested effort would be made to have it appear as a unit in the <br />zoning By -Law. <br />Tom Deveau, 42 Eldred wanted to sake a statement. Mr. Lund asked for questions <br />only at this time. <br />Mr. Deveau referred to the last part of the proposal . . Bedford ST. bounded <br />by Grove St. and suggested this would indicate Oneida Corp. could still develop. <br />Mr. Lund said he thinks part of the Oneida land is below 130 mol and the remaining <br />part,.could be developed. <br />Mr. galeski, planning director, mentioned that Oneida land will be exempt for 7 years. <br />Norman Richards asked if be would have to comply and obtain * permit in order to <br />rebuild his home. <br />Friedman thinks he would have to apply and got a permit. <br />Warren Roberts mentioned change in nater conditions as result of changes and asked <br />if a person can sue for damages and get money for these damages. <br />