Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD HEARINGS <br />June 8, 1967 <br />The Lexington Planning Board held two hearings in Science Hall, <br />Senior High School, on June 8, 1967. Present were Chairman Greeley, <br />members Riffin and worrell, Planning Director Zaleski, and the secretary, <br />Mrs. Macomber. <br />At 7:00 p.m. the first hearing was called to order with the <br />reading of the notice as it had been published in the Lexington Minute- <br />man as required. Mr. Greeley explained that this proposal is to add <br />funeral homes to the list of ,permitted uses in C 4 - Small office dis- <br />tricts, subject to permission by the Board of Appeals. He explained, <br />also, that this is a modification of a hearing held two weeks ago at <br />which time the Planning Board was considering the use of funeral homes <br />in residential zones on the main street. One of the problems that had <br />arisen was how to define a major street, and other problems had also <br />developed, so the Planning Board asked that the article be changed to <br />its present form. A hearing is now being held on the changed article. <br />The only change from the zoning by-law is that funeral homes would now <br />be allowed in C 4 districts with the Board of Appeals issuing a special <br />permit. There is only one such district now, on Waltham St. near the <br />city line. The Planning Board knows of no intent to use that area for <br />a funeral home, but there is a proposal coming up to change to C 4 <br />district some land in back of the First National Store on Worthen Rd. <br />and there is information that there would be a proposal to put a funeral <br />home there if the change is passed by the Town Meeting. <br />There was no discussion and nobody spoke in favor nor in opposition, <br />and the hearing closed at 7:15 p.m. <br />The second hearing then opened on a proposal, in essence, to <br />prohibit building on lots of less than 5,000 sq.ft. and 50 ft. frontage, <br />and also to require the consolidation of two or more adjacent lots which <br />are vacant and in one ownership into one lot or into lots of not less <br />than 12,500 sq.ft. area and 100 ft. frontage. A person owning a built - <br />upon house lot plus an adjacent vacant lot of at least 50 ft. frontage <br />and 5,000 sq.ft. area would be permitted to sell or build upon the vacant <br />lot independently of the house lot. In cases where the consolidation of <br />several small lots in one ownership would result in lots significantly <br />larger than other existing built -upon lots in the vicinity, the Board of <br />Appeals would have the power to permit special exceptions from the con- <br />solidation requirements. <br />A hearing was held on May 18 on a broader concept and as a result <br />of that hearing this proposal evolved. Mr. Zaleski showed slides depicting <br />various combinations of lots that might be affected. <br />Since the subject had been thoroughly discussed at the first hear- <br />ing, only a few specific questions on personal problems were asked, and the <br />hearing closed at 7:40 p.m. , <br />Louise M. Macomber, Secretary <br />