|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1967-05-25
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1967
>
1967-05-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:06 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:17:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD HEARING <br />' May 25, 1967 <br />The Lexington Planning Board held six hearings in.Science Hall, <br />Lexington High School, on Thursday, May 259 1967. Present were Chairman <br />Greeley, members Fowle, Riffin and Worrell, and the secretary, Mrs.. <br />Macomber. <br />The first proposal, initiated by the Planning Board, was to change <br />the required minimum area and street frontage in CS districts from 60,000 <br />sq.ft. to 15,500 sq.ft. and 175 ft. to 125 ft. frontage. Mr. Greeley <br />stated that the Planning Board originally recommended the larger lots <br />which were adopted by the Town. However, the Board now believes these <br />lots to be too restrictive. <br />Mr. Conroy asked if there were any plans on how this could be, <br />developed and Mr. Greeley replied that the lot coverage remains at 25% <br />maximum and the plans would operate the same as now with 40 ft. yard <br />where the lot abuts on a street or a less restricted zone, 20 ft. where <br />the lot abuts on other property in the same zone. This would not apply to <br />residential use in this district. <br />Mr. Conroy said the parking requirements seem vague - no specific <br />amount recommended. Mr. Greeley said no.change was contemplated now but <br />' maybe the requirements should be made more specific. On a 60,000 ft. lot <br />it would be easy to find parking area and still build on a 25%. h It now <br />would be the same size lot as is required in the R l district in the 30,000 <br />sq.ft. area. <br />There was no further discussion and the hearing closed at 8:40 p.m. <br />A hearing was then opened on a proposal to rezone from C 1 to CS <br />district a parcel of land formerly known as the "Many" property and now <br />occupied by the K of C and the Stevens Co., comprised of approximately <br />18.3 acres. Mr. Worrell showed a picture of the town zoning map showing <br />the district in question. He explained that this proposal had two pur- <br />poses. In the first place in the recent past the Planning Board had pro- <br />posed the Town Meeting accept a service and trade use, which was approved, <br />and this represents an attempt to put what the Board feels would be a <br />suitable piece of land into the service and trade use; and secondly it <br />represents an attempt to improve the future of Bedford St. The problem of <br />Bedford St. is one of traffic and as the traffic builds up on the street <br />it tends to make the street less desirable for residential use which de- <br />preciates property value and gives more incentive for people to ask for <br />rezoning. Another slide was shown giving more detail of the area involved. <br />This area is presently zoned C 1. <br />' The land as presently zoned has a greater value than it would have <br />under the CS zoning. Mr. Worrell said he had talked with Mr. Stevens who <br />had also come to the Planning Board, and they have been unable to come to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.