1964-01-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PLANNINu isOAttu Mb�ErING January 111, 1964 The Planning Board held a regular meeting in its office, Town Office Building, on Tuesday, January 14, 1964 at 8:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Meyer and members Bryson, Campbell, Greeley and Mabee. With reference to the acquisition of the Lyon's property on Waltham Street for public parking purposes, Mr. Mabee agreed LYON PROPERTY to remind Miss Murray that it is essential to have an article in the town warrant for the Annual Meeting in regard to same. Taken under consideration was the following Form A appli- FORM A BOARD OF PPEALS COUNTRY -WIDE OFFICES CORP. cation for determination of Planning Board jurisdiction: #64-2, submitted January 7, 1964 for Hazel Smith, by Nathaniel Ellis, Atty.; plan entitled "Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass.", Scale: 1" = 101, dated Dec. 28, 1963, Miller & Nylander, C.E.'s & Surveyors. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously VOTED: that the Lexington Planning Board determines that the plan accompanying Form A application #64-2 does not re- ' quire approval under the subdivision control law, and that said plan be so endorsed. Taken under consideration were the notices of hearings to be held by the Board of Appeals on January 28, 1964. It was decided to take no action on these with the exception of Pinecre'st Realty Trust requesting permission to build a nurs- ing home on Watertown Street and Frank D. Walker for permis- sion to build a house on Bacon Street, which is an unaccepted street. The Board decided to ask for further particulars on these petitions. Next considered was the request of the Board of Appeals for recommendations on the petition of Country -wide Offices Corp. for a finding and determination on plan submitted, en- titled "S-1", and dated December 19, 1963. It was voted to approve the plan subject to agreement that they will connect to town sewer when and if it becomes available; will work out with the State Dept. of Public Works adequate means for dis- posal of storm drainage. It was noted: that permanent access would be provided substantially as shown in the revised sketch; that the set -back from -the new access road would be only 80 feet; that the proposed parking lot extends to closer ` than 50 ft. from the widened Route 2; but that the spirit of this regulation was nevertheless satisfied. The clerk was instructed to write to the Board of Appeals. (See addendum.) FORM A BOARD OF PPEALS COUNTRY -WIDE OFFICES CORP.