1959-10-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

10-13-59 -2- Subdivision Control Law, and that said plan be so endorsed. The attention of the Board was called to Mr. GREEN Stevens' October 9, 1959 letter in regard to obtain - VALLEY Ing easements and grants of utilities in the "Green SEC. 4 Valley Section Four" subdivision. All matters appear - Ing to be in order, unon motion duly made and BUSA seconded, it was unanimously VOTED: To release the ner£ormance bond, dated March 5, 1959s filed by Antonio Busa, as Principal, and Aetna Insurance Company, as Suretj,in the sum of eleven thousand dollars --(111,000)-- to secure the performance by the subdivider of his agreement in the form of an application for approval of a definitive plan, Form C, dated January 16, 1959, to complete the work to be performed by the subdivider as shown on the sub- division plan entitled "Green Valley Section Four Lexington, Mass.", and dated January 12, 1959. Read to the Board was a letter dated October POLLEN HILL 9, 1959 from Pollen Hill Estates Assn.,Inc. request - ESTATES ing arrangement for a meeting with the Planning Board ASSN. to discuss the proposed extension of Buckman Drive to Moreland Avenue. In reply to said request the Chair- man by letter informed said association that when and if this extension is planned it will be preceded by a public hearing which will be advertised in the Lexing- ton Minute -man. (See Addendum.) From 8:25 to 8:40 p.m. Mr. George S. DeVries, WINCHESTER representing the Winchester Development Corp., net ESTATES with the Board to discuss the revised Winchester Es- tates Section 4 plan and to request that the Board, WINCHESTER as the Winchester rlanning Board had done, endorse DEVELOPMENT said plan on the basis that it did not require appro CORP. val under the Subdivision Control Law. (See October 5, 1959 Planning Board minutes.) The Board did not endorse said plan stating that it would refer it to the Town Counsel. Mr. DeVries also inquired about arrangements LO:dELL for delaying the construction of sidewalks in the ESTATES Lowell Estates subdivision until after he ccm pleted houses therein. It was suggested that the subdivider, LEXINGTON Lexington Development Co., could be released from the DEVELOPMENT provisions of its covenant with the Town provided CO. said company substituted a bond in the amount neces- sary to cover the cost of completing the unfinished work in said subdivision. Mr. DeVries• was referred tc 1 C