Laserfiche WebLink
In reply to Mr. MacNeil's comment that he felt <br />it was in error that the railroad was included in a <br />residential zone, Chairman Adams stated that the town <br />had purposely left the railroad in residential zone <br />as a non -conforming use. Mr. MacNeil was asked if he <br />had given any consideration to requesting the town to <br />re -zone his land for general business use. He replied <br />that he wanted his tract of land between business dis- <br />trict and the railroad station for a grass plot and <br />frontage and not for business. It was pointed out that <br />a re -zoning would affect the set -back requirements of <br />the tract between the two different zones and might <br />remove the necessity of petitioning for a variance. <br />With reference to other problems, Mr. MacNeil <br />said that he thought a three-foot sideyard along the <br />railroad right-of-way was a good idea. He was asked <br />why the plot of land did not extend all the way to the <br />railroad. Mr. MacNeil reported that the railroad wished <br />to keep a strip of land for an extension of the station <br />sidewalk. <br />Upon being questioned as to the location of en - <br />to the proposed building, Mr. MacNeil said that <br />there would be no entrances onto the right-of-way be- <br />tween the building and the Barrett Press and that three <br />entrances to stores would be from the sidewalk with the <br />exception of a service entrance off said right-of-way. <br />Messrs. MacNeil and Morehouse left the meeting at <br />8:25 p.m. <br />At 8:45 p.m. Mr.Jaquith came to the meeting at <br />which time the Board met with Messrs. McConchie and <br />Nylander who brought to the meeting a preliminary plan <br />for the Robinson Hill, Sec. 3 subdivision accompanied <br />by an application for tentative approval of said plan. <br />After a brief discussion of the plans, the Board took <br />said plans under advisement at the same time asking for <br />a complete plan and profile of the proposed road con- <br />necting with Wingate Road as had been approved. Messrs. <br />McConchie and Nylander left the meeting at 9:10 p.m. <br />The Board next took under consideration four <br />schemes Mr. Silva had presented to the Board at its <br />April 9, 1956 meeting for the development of his land <br />at the end of Snnny Knoll Terrace. It was noted that <br />this dead-end street was somewhat longer than the <br />maximum allowed under the subdivision rules and regu- <br />lations for streets of this type, that an extension to <br />Garfield Street would be approximately 475 feet in <br />length, and that the terrace had no permanent or tem- <br />porary turnaround making it very difficult to plow and <br />ROBINSON <br />HILL <br />SEC. 3 <br />SUNNY KNOLL <br />TERRACE <br />