Laserfiche WebLink
and your reply of Sept. 12, 1955 in regard to the sale of <br />tax title and other town property which might have possible <br />use for recreation purposes. In your letter you indicated <br />that,the Planning Board would only be interested in land <br />for recreational purposes. After further consideration of <br />this matter the Board feels that it might be interested in <br />any tax title lots being sold regardless of size or location. <br />The Board would, therefore, appreciate that you send it <br />notice of any possible sale of tax title or other town owned <br />property before such sale is consummated. This request is <br />being made for the following reasons: <br />1. At present this Board's recreation studies are only in <br />the form of notes and rough maps. Before publishing <br />its recommended recreation plan, the Board wishes to <br />complete and correlate its neighborhood plan studies. <br />The Board also believes it should negotiate for and, <br />if,possible, obtain options on land in order to avoid <br />speculation, inflated land values and high costs to <br />the Town. <br />2. In a number of instances it may be desirable to develop <br />fairly good existing and proposed sites into better ones <br />through the expansion of an area, the gain of a better <br />access, or provision of access where none is available <br />now. It may also be possible to do this without direct <br />purchase by exchanging now privately owned for tax title <br />or other town lands even in instances where individual <br />lots have an area much too small to be used for recreation <br />in themselves. This is one reason why the Board would <br />like to have the opportunity to recommend the retention <br />of certain town -owned parcels should it feel that these <br />could be used to the advantage of the town for other than <br />building purposes. <br />3. The Board has noted that there are a number of larger <br />parcels of land which serve as potential residential <br />developments but which are not now being considered <br />because there are house lots between the parcels and <br />nearby streets. It is thought that it would be to the <br />best interests of the Town if properly -located vacant <br />lots, either privately or town -owned, could be retained <br />as parcels only to be used as access into back land <br />useable. for development. It is for this reason also <br />that the Board'`would like to be able to review the <br />matter before any possible future sale of tax title or <br />other town -owned property. <br />As soon as it can fit such work into its present <br />schedule, the Planning Board will prepare a map indicating <br />' where it recommends lands be acquired, retained or exchanged <br />for recreation or street access purposes. When this is com- <br />pleted this Board would then like to meet with the Select- <br />men to discuss these recommendations. <br />Very truly yours, <br />LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD <br />/s/Alan G. Adams, Chairman <br />