|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1956-04-09
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1950-1959
>
1956
>
1956-04-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:16:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VOTED: that the definitive subdivision plan en- <br />titled "Adams Estates Section Two Lex- <br />' <br />ington, Mass.", dated Dec. 21, 1955, <br />which was submitted to the Board by Louis <br />M. Nystrom on February 27, 1956, accom- <br />panied by an application for approval of <br />definitive plan, Form C, dated January 10, <br />1956, be and hereby is disapproved f or <br />the reasons that the statement on the <br />application as to title is in error and <br />that the Board is unable to find that the <br />applicant is the owner of the land. <br />COMPLETION <br />Mr. Snow asked Mr. Stevens what action the Board <br />OF WORK <br />could take in regard to cases where the Board had ac - <br />UNDER SUB- <br />cepted a conditional approval contract as a perform - <br />DIVISION <br />ance guarantee and subdivision work had not been com- <br />REGULATIONS <br />leted within a year as agreed in Paragraph 6 of the <br />Form C) application for approval of a definitive plan. <br />Mr. Stevens said he thought the Board should <br />take some action when the time work should have been <br />completed had expired and that in such a case the <br />Board had the rigght to rescind its approval of a sub- <br />division plan. In cases where a bond had been filed <br />as a performance guarantee and the bond mentioned <br />' <br />liquidated damages, Mr. Stevens said that the Board can <br />try a case and bring a suit against the subdivider for <br />the sum of the bond. He suggested that Mr. Snow keep the <br />Board informed of all those who have not completed work <br />in the various subdivisions being developed so that <br />letters could be written stating the work had not been <br />completed. In cases where bonding companies are in- <br />volved, letters can be sent to then as well as subdi- <br />viders stating that unless something is.done to complete <br />the necessary work, the Board will take appropriate <br />action. <br />FRISSORE <br />Mr. Stevens left the meeting at 10:55 p.m. at which <br />- <br />time Mr. Snow asked the Board to reconsider its action <br />BATTLE VIEW <br />of the previous week in regard to its informal opinion <br />PARK <br />Mr. Frissore had requested of his proposal for a road <br />between Laconia and Fifth Streets.- Mr. Snow had pre- <br />pared several studies indicating possibilities for <br />development of the area as a whole in order to deter- <br />mine what he thought would be the most desirable de- <br />velopment of Mr. Fri'ssore's property in relation to <br />adjacent parcels of land. As a result of these studies, <br />he suggested a road relocation on the print Mr.'Frissore <br />had submitted. To accompany the print Mr. Snow also <br />prepared for :the Boards consideration'a letter addressed ' <br />to Mr. Frissore and dated April 9, 1956. The Board <br />approved the letter and it was signed by the Chairman. <br />RECREATION <br />The Board considered next the preliminary plan of <br />AND SCHOOL <br />Techbuilt to extend the Middle Ridge subdivision. Dur - <br />SITE <br />ing the discussion Mr. Snow said that he had examined <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.