1955-05-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

' Monday, May 23, 1955 Presents Adams - Abbott, Grindle, Hathaway, Irwin, Jaquith .. Snow Meeting opened at 7:30 otclock. Moore - Hearin A public hearing was held at 7:30 on application for definitive approval as a subdivision the property of Moore Realty Trust, an exten- sion of Essex Street in a northwesterly direction for a.distanoe of approximately 268 ft. from Laurel to Park Sts, Mark Moore Jr. was present for petitioner. No citizens were present and there were no ob- jections. Mr. Moore stated that he wished to waive the subdivision rules and regulations requiring that the street be paved. Adjacent streets are of gravel. He plans to construct a gravel surfacing which he will oil. Hearing closed at 7135 o1clock. The Planning Board -minutes of May 16 were read and approved. DeVries Construction Co. ' F.or�m.�C,� an application for approval of a definitive subdivision plan was sut�itted on May 23, 1955 by DeVries Construction Co. The accompanying plans were entitled "Section 7 of Sun Valley, Lexington, Mass.," dated May 2, 1955 and prepared by -Kenneth B. Oates, C.E. It was moved by We Grindle, seconded by Mr. Jaquith and unanimously VOTED: that the hearing on the definitive plan of Section 7, Sun Valley submitted by DeVries Construction Co, be held on Monday, June 6, Torn Engineer's Office, at 7:4.5 o'clock. Form A application No. 55-43, submitted on May 20, 1955 by miary HicLeZ acacz`ng entitled "Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass.,* scale 1 o , April 22, 1955, Miller & Nylander, C.E.ts and Surveyors, Lexington, Mass. It was moved by Mr. Hathaway, seconded by Mr. Abbott and unani- mously VOTED: that the above plan be signed bearing the endorsement "Lsx- ington Plaiming Board approval not required under the Sub- division control law." Form A No. 55-43, submitted on May 20, 1955 by Robert L. L tracing en%d "A Compiled Plan of Land in Lexington, ss., 9C$ a ]« - 8013 May 1.73 1955, Miller & Nylander, CZ, Is and Surveyors, Lexington, Mass. It was moved by Mr. Hathaway, seconded by Mr. Abbott and unani- mously VOTED: that this plan be disapproved because it was thought to require approval under the subdivision control law.