|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1955-02-17
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1950-1959
>
1955
>
1955-02-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:14 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:16:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MEETIIJG <br />Thursday, February 17, 1955 <br />Present: Adams, Grindle, Hathaway, Irwin, Jaquith, Ripley, <br />PUALIC HEARING - SEABURY <br />A public hearing was held Thursday, February 17, 1955 at 8:00.o'clock in <br />Estabrook Hall on petition of Frida Semler Seabury and others to amend the <br />Lexington Zoning By-law by changing a certain area from an R-1 District to an <br />A-1 District, land between Marrett Rd., Route 128, and Massachusetts Avenue. <br />Approximately 120 citizens were present. <br />Mr. John Groden, Attorney, 12 Summit Road, Lexington represented the pe- <br />titioner. slides were shown of preliminary sketches which Mr. Eduard Full.er- <br />jahn, Architect, explained. These showed the proposed site of the hotel, <br />which would contain 24 double bedrooms and restaurant; parking space; and <br />plan for a park surrounding the historical Haywood pump. <br />Mr. John Harvey, 1 Constitution road, asked what would become of the re- <br />mainder of the property. Mr. Groden stated that there were no immediate plans <br />for the remainder of the territory, that the wooded area would remain as it is <br />wherever possible. Maxfield Parrish Jr., 7 Paul Revere rd. asked if it were <br />true that there would be some 30 acres rezoned to A-1 and no plans for it. The <br />answer was that the primary purpose is for a hotel and they want nothing to <br />interfere with the beauty or use of the land around it. Elmer Frey, 6 Holton <br />' rd, asked if there would be a sewer connection, and if not whatifthere were <br />difficulty* with septic tanks. P"r. Groden stated that there was not a sewer <br />available at present but that they had had tests made and found that septic <br />tanks would be feasible. The land in itself is a watershed. Since the By-law <br />calls for connection with a sewer in A-1 districts, Mr. Adams explained that <br />he thought it might be possible to vary this if there were territorial diffi- <br />culties and the situation could be satisfactorily taken care of. <br />Mr. Coqui7lette, 235 Waltham st., asked how many acres there are at present <br />zoned for A-1 and was answered about 8 acres. Robert Johnson, 60 Wood st, <br />stated that he couldn't believe there would be 38 acres on which they would <br />pay taxes and not do anything with. He also stated that the citizens in that <br />area want to keep it a residential zone and he didn't think they should have <br />to go down every once in a while and fight to keep it so; that there should be <br />a more°valid reason for changing this zone. Felix Cutler, 4 Carley rd. stated <br />that once an area is broken down it is very easy to change it to some other <br />form. Mr. Adams reminded him that changes in zoning could only be done through <br />the legal channels which means a 2/3 vote at a town meeting after a public <br />hearing. <br />Kenneth Pau, 55 Wood st. asked if these were to be sleeping quarters or <br />living quarters. lair. Groden replied that it was planned as a country hotel or <br />inn with bedrooms with bath and restroom facilities but no,cooking facilities. <br />They plan for transients. Mr. Rau asked if having a place to house so many <br />' people would not defeat the purpose of the change in zoning which called for <br />larger lot areas and was answered that it was not proposed to house Lexington <br />residents and so would not increase the number of citizens or school -children. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.