Laserfiche WebLink
C� <br />i <br />PLANNING BOARD MEETING <br />Monday, June 14,1954 <br />Present: Adams, Grindle, Hathaway, Irwin, Jaquith, Ripley - Stevens, Burns. <br />Meeting opened at 7:45 o'clock. <br />Ne.R <br />X'. Newgent presented plan for informal opinion as to location of <br />driveway as shown on plan of Lots A and B, Mariam 6t, and Abbott Rd., land <br />Of Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Dodge. Believed to be O.R. <br />-.sem <br />Form A dated June 14, 1954 submitted by W. John Baskin on Plan dated <br />June 9, 1954 showing subdivision of lots 21 A and B on Mariam St., 21 A to"?be <br />conveyed to purchaser of Lot 22, and lot 21-B to be conveyed to purchaser of <br />Lot 20. Moved by Mr. Hathaway, seconded by Mr. Irwin that, --plan be approved <br />and so voted. Plan was signed bearing endorsement "Approval not required <br />under subdivision control law." <br />Bill <br />Bill presented by H. Be McArdle, 4 reams mimeo paper for forms, $9.00. <br />Unanimously voted the bill be paid. <br />McConchie <br />Mr. Leland McConchie presented plan dated June 14, 1954, Miller & <br />Nylander, of Robinson Hill for tentative approval. Returned for check on .. <br />temporary turnaround and for signature of proper owner. <br />Tocci - Belotti <br />Mrs. Tocci of 8 Concord Turnpike and Mrs. Belotti of 10 Concord <br />Turnpike presented plan dated April 10, 19S4 by Joseph Selwyn showing sub- <br />division of lots 35-36, Land Court Case 90480, on Concord Turnpike and Bow- <br />man St. This has to 9oa.it a period of 15 days from decision of Board of. <br />Appeals before being signed. <br />Wildes <br />Mr. Robert Wildes of Nancy Rd., Concord submitted plan of Park <br />Heights dated May 19, 1927 by Robert Bellamy of Dorchester. Not a matter <br />for the Planning Board if it was approved under 1924 Zoning law as stated. <br />Cahill <br />Mr. John Cahill of 152 Acton St., Watertown, and Mr. Fred Joyce <br />submitted for informal discussion plan showing 33 lots on East..street up to <br />Woburn line. Left for Mr. Burns to check, <br />to e <br />Mr. Adams reported he had received a reply from Richard Wakefield <br />