Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />PLUMM BOARD NWING <br />Monday, April 2,1951 <br />Presents Adams, Couette, Irwin, Johnson, Ripley,and Mr.Stevens,Town Counsel. <br />Meeting opened at 7s30 p.m. <br />Mr. Fletcher of Architects Collaborative appeared for tentative approval <br />of preliminary layout of development on Concord Avenue, original survey by <br />Miller & Nylander, called Five Fields, an area of approximately BU acres, <br />roughly one-half of which is to be developed comprising about 70 lots. Mr. <br />Couette suggested that instead of the two dead ends on the water main some <br />system be devised whereby circulation of water would be provided, also an <br />easement whereby the water main and road could be extended in the future, <br />which was agreeable. Mr. Fletcher stated that they were contemplating an en- <br />trance road, and that it was expected to post a bond for first portion of the <br />road in about three Creeks. The plans were left for further consultation with <br />Mr. Burns, Town Engineer, after which tentative approval would be given by <br />the Board when approved by Mr. Burns. <br />Ui& <br />' Bills were presented by Louise M. Baker, $3.W for stenographic eer- <br />vice for month of March; and by Mass.Federation of Planning Boards, $20.00, <br />dues for membership. Unanimously voted these bills be paid. <br />ng Farm J@M <br />Mr. Smoot Lindstrom, Building Inspector, appeared for information, <br />stating that Mr. DeBonis of Deb Homes, Inc. wished to put house lots on Aim- <br />ing Farm Lane, using the Lane as his street, and Mr. Lindstrom wished to know <br />if the Planning Board felt this could be dome. The Planning Board agreed <br />that this was not shown on the plan of development approved by the Board, <br />that Winning Farm Lane was not a so-called accepted street, and that a permit <br />to build on it should not be given. <br />Clr=1 Pita <br />Mr. Lindstrom also wished to know about gravel pits - how far and how <br />deep could they go and how much sand and loam could be taken from the town. <br />He stated that the zoning laws did not specify this and wished that there <br />could be something definite inserted. The Board agreed and felt that the <br />matter should be further studied and some of the gravel pits investigated. Mr. <br />Stevens suggested that the operators be talked with, and if they do not agree <br />to do something about it, get an injunction and the court will make them. He <br />felt it was the job of the Planning Board to get information. <br />