Laserfiche WebLink
HEARING - ZONING BY-IAWS <br />Thursday, November 2, 1950, 8 o'clock, Cary Memorial Hall <br />The hearing opened at 8 o'clock with the following members of the <br />Planning Board present: Cromwell, Adams, Caouette, Johnson, Potter, Ripley. <br />Town Counsel Harold Stevens also present. <br />The chairman, i1r. Cromwell, opened the meeting by stating that the <br />Board did not wish to foist its views upon the townspeople but that it had <br />spent a great deal of time and thought on the matter and was now willing to <br />listen to the views and suggestions of the citizens. The Planning Board <br />will then meet and consider what has been said and may possibly make changes <br />before the matter comes to vote at the Town Meeting. <br />There were no comments until Section /+. i;Ir. Merriam suggested that <br />the new location of Route 128 be placed upon the map. <br />_CbLR_2. I&% Merriam stated that quite a few of R-2 areas have been <br />eliminated, and that there is quite a mixture of single and 2 -family houses <br />on Grant Street to Sherman Street, both sides of Fletcher Avenue to RR tracks <br />which will be in the R-2 district. He proposed that the area west side of <br />Grant Street to RR track to Adams Press property which already has one or <br />two 2 -family houses remain in R-2 district. <br />' Mrs.Louise Sexton inquired if she understood correctly that no more <br />2 -family houses could be built unless it was in the R-2 district and was <br />told that that was correct. <br />(c) 9. Parrett Road and Waltham Street. The people in that neigh- <br />borhood are opposed to an increase in the C-1 district. They feel that the <br />present territory is enough. Speaking in opposition to the change were: <br />John Downey, 4 Farmcrest Ave.; Idr. Kelly, 437 Waltham St.; John Spencer, 439 <br />Waltham St.; IYs. Coleman, 435 Waltham St.; I4rs. Fbx, 410 Waltham St.; Mr. <br />Illorse, 43 Farmcrest Ave. Mr. Downey asked if it would be possible to have a <br />petition prepared for the Town L%eting to have the article dropped. He <br />stated he represented other property owners who wish to sign such a petition. <br />IAr.Cromwell stated that the Board would be willing to receive a petition, but <br />the surest way was to put it before the Town L%eting. <br />1,1r. lubrey asked if there was anyone present who felt differently about <br />that area, and apparently there was not. <br />(d) C-1 areas. iir. Don Hathaway stated that C-1 areas had been re- <br />duced, one of which is Five Forks. He asked what effect this reduction will <br />have on the value of the properties which are proposed to be put back in the <br />R-1 area. i's. Cromwell replied that any change in zoning is apt to take from <br />some and give to others, it is unavoidable, but that over a period of time it <br />is necessary that zoning laws be changed. <br />' Mr. Richard Porter spoke of his desire to have his property at 786 <br />Concord Turnpike changed to C-1 district in order that he might erect a <br />Howard Johnson stand. <br />