Laserfiche WebLink
PLAN' I_ C; BOARD ITING <br />July 9, 1937 <br />' i public neeting of the Planning Board was held in the <br />�lectmen's Room, Town Office Building, Lexinrrton at 8:00 P. Id. <br />Iressrs. Kimball, ILraetzer and Ferguson of the Planning Board <br />r:ere present. The Secretary, Eleanor M. Lowe, was also present. <br />The following persons were present at the meeting: &Ir. <br />Irving Currier, Boward I_unroe, I,r. John Heffernan (Currier?s <br />attorney), and 1.1r. & Mrs. Albert E. Olsen. <br />.Tvir. Kimball was elected Chairman pro -tem, and Yr. Ferguson <br />was elected Clerk pro -tem. <br />The Chairman pro -tem stated that an amendment to the Zon- <br />ing By -Law required fourteen days? notice in the local paper <br />and notice by mail to those property owners designated by the <br />Planning Board as being effected by the amendment. A hearing <br />is held before the Planning Board, which is required to report <br />and make its recommendation as to what action shall be taken, <br />before the Town Meeting. That means that any citizen may bring <br />in any petition for amendment, and. the Board must hear the party. <br />There is no tine limit in which the Board must act. <br />Par. Kimball said that Iar. Currier had presented a petition, <br />on account of which this meeting was called, and it was presented <br />at a time when it was expected that there i^could be a Town Yeet- <br />in` early in the summer. That meant fast movement by all <br />parties to get the petition in and to get it before the Town. <br />The result was, without placing the blame anywhere, that the <br />amendment on which this meeting was called, was not in conformity <br />with the context of the present zoning By -Laws. The Chairman <br />pro -tem said that there was nothing in the petition that was Lowell & <br />not legal, but there ; as doubt if it accomplished what L, r. Woburn Sts <br />Currier desired. He said that as far as he knew nog°r, there <br />v,Tould not be a Town Meeting; before the second of August, at the <br />earliest possible date, and it probably would not be until a <br />week or so later. He said that it was the feeling of the Hoard <br />that, unless there :;as opposition, that the Hearing on Irving <br />Currier's petition should be postponed until a later date. <br />Due notice would be given to the property oviners. He asked if <br />there was any objection to this procedure. <br />➢,ir. &Trus. Olsen stated that they would not offer any ob- <br />jection. Idessrs. currier, Heffernan, and Yunroe said that they <br />would not object. <br />Yir. Ferguson moved that the hearing on this petition be <br />postponed until August 6, 1937. Yr. Kraetzer seconded the <br />motion and it was so voted. <br />Discussion centered around the wording of the proposed. <br />amendment and draft cop;- prepared which appeared to be <br />sufficiently descriptive and consistent with similar articles <br />in the Tonin; Bir -Lagar. It was definitely understood that the <br />' Board was advising in the construction of the paragraph but <br />not the subject matter and was not committing itself as to sub- <br />