|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1933-05-16
Breadcrumb Navigation:
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1930-1939
>
1933
>
1933-05-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:07:41 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:16:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MMETING OF PLANNING BOARD <br />May i6, 1933 <br />A meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was held at the Town <br />Office Building on Tuesday evening, May l6, 1933 at 7:45 o'clock. <br />Messrs. Duffy, Glynn, Kimball, Milne and Robinson were present; also <br />the secretary. <br />INNIS - DAVIS ICE COMPANY PETITION <br />A formal petition from Mr. r. L. Innis was in hand, asking for <br />a change to an M-1 District of the property of the Davis Ice Company <br />on Grant Street; the petition also bearing the signatures of the owners <br />of 50% in valuation of the property within the area designated by the <br />Board on May 2. These property owners had not been certified by the <br />Board of Assessors, and the secretary was instructed to obtain their <br />certificate. The change is asked, in order that an ice -manufacturing <br />plant may be permitted at that location, which is now in a 0-1 Zone. <br />LIMITED -APARTMENT BUILDINGS <br />Mr. W. Roger Greeley and Mr. Kraetzer came before the Board for <br />a further discussion of the proposed Amendment providing for the oon- <br />struction of Limited -Apartment buildings outside the business zone. <br />Mr. Greeley questioned with respect to that part of Section 7 (b) of <br />the proposed amendment, relative to the specified width of driveways <br />from the frontage street to the building. The Board had written this <br />to read "not less than 20 feet in width of traveled way from the street <br />to the entrance of the building", having in mind adequate access par- <br />ticularly for fire apparatus. Mr. Greeley stated that his project had <br />planned a driveway width of only 15 feet, for the reason that a greater <br />width would encourage the parking of cars along the driveway. He had <br />agreed to this with Mr. Hadley, owner of the property adjoining the <br />entrance on Clark Street The Board decided that 15 feet seemed a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.