1933-02-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

-3 - Planning Board Meeting February 17, 1933 the area and previously the Board did not do so becaise they used the same one the Selectmen used for his previous hearings. When fir. Perkins asked the distance which was supposed to be covered, Mr. Duffy stated that the districts covered no fixed distance. It covered the area which the Board thought was affected by the petition. Mr. Perkins felt that from Oak Street to Follen Road and from his place to the Rest Inn was double the distance. He also said that the area was unreasonable because it included three gasoline stations and seventy lots on Hillside Avenue whose owners live out of town, Monica Holland living in California at the present time. Mr. Duffy informed him that a larger area might just as well reflect favorably on him as unfavorably. Mr. Perkins said he presented signatures of 75% of the valua- tion in the district last year and it was not enough to get a feeling from the Board as they were all against it from the start. This place in question has been doing business for 120 years. He asked the Town Engineer to state the distance from Oak Street to Follen Road and the Rest Inn and was informed that from Oak Street to Follen Road is Frank W, about 1190 feet and from Oak Street to the Rest Inn about 1400 feet* Ye -r -Es He then asked the Board to consider the names that he presented last year and lir. Duffy informed him that they could not consider it. He then asked to have the area, as it was before. Mr. Glynn stated that he thought the Board should consider the matter later and let him know if the area is changed. 1r. Perkins stated that he wanted to know then. Mr. Milne stated that he agreed with Mr. Glynn and Mr. Duffy in saying that the Board would let him know if the area is changed. After Mr. Perkins left, the matter was discussed and a letter was written informing him that the area designated by the Planning Board would remain the same. Mr. Duffy reported that he had talked with Bir. Hartman re- garding the proposed R. 3 District, and had been informed br'Mr, Hartman that he would have to prepare amendments to the Zoning Law which would incooperate in it the specifications and other changes the Board felt was proper and he felt that he could not do it as a State matter and would have to do it as commercial matter and it would cost $50.00. Mr. Duffy said he instructed him to go ahead with it. It was moved and seconded that the payment to Mr. Hartman for advice on zoning matters amounting to $50.00 be approved for payment when presented and it was unanimously voted. It was decided that notices for this hearing, if there is any, will be sent to all Town Meeting kembers and registered return receipts sent only to the property owners who were notified for the Board of Appeals hearing on this same subject. which Mr. Hart- m--anreg�ard- nin R District It was decided that Mr. Duffy call a meeting when he receives the articles from Mr. Hartman. Respectfully submitted, Clerk