|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1932-12-20
Breadcrumb Navigation:
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1930-1939
>
1932
>
1932-12-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:07:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:16:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD ItiIEETING <br />December 20, 1932 <br />A meeting of the Planning 3oard was held in the Conference <br />Room of the Town Office Building, Tuesday, December .20,, 1932, at <br />8:00 P. Iii. 1,essrs. Emery, Milne, Glynn, Scheibe and,j)uffy were <br />present. The Town Engineer and secretary were also present. <br />Mr. Emery stated that he had talked with Mr. Shurtleff in <br />regard to Vine Brook and found that there are four kinds of <br />'JJ111o,ms: Common, White., Laurel Leaf and Weeping, and that within <br />the last few years a blight has taken them so they have to be <br />sprayed, The trees should be planted 40 to 50 feet apart for the <br />edging effect over a brook or walk. He suggested planting a Maple <br />after every two 'Nillou°Ts so that if anything happened to kill out <br />"'Dillow <br />the 'a'Jillows, the Maples would still be there. Fie also stated that <br />Trees <br />there should be only one foot elevation or less because when the <br />for Vine <br />time comes to grade, it will affect the growth of the trees. The <br />Brook <br />Town Engineer should determine the distance between the trees so <br />that the steam shovel when excavating would not interfere with tle m. <br />He did not think ills assistance would be needed as the Town 'Engineer <br />could handle the situation. <br />3 <br />Mr. Cosgrove informed the Board that he had attended the meet- <br />ing of the I>iass. Federation of Planning Boards held in Boston, Dec- <br />Pdass. <br />ember 14th, and stated that before spring they intend to call two <br />Federa- <br />or three meetings of the associated Planning Boards and organize <br />tion of <br />to put bills into effect. <br />Planning <br />Boards <br />Ivr. Cosgrove also stated that Mr. Barry E. Johnson appealed <br />to the Board of Survey for a more favorable decision in regard to <br />his development called Brick Village. 1�1r. Trask advised him that <br />Lex. <br />the Planning Board had given its decision and the Board. of Survey <br />Brick <br />would back it up and if 'oe wanted any further action he would have <br />Village <br />to present another plan to the Planning Board showing a different <br />entrance to the property. <br />1,1r. Duffy stated that he had discussed the matter of unemployed <br />engineers with the Emergency Planning and Research Corporation and <br />found that they would ask for a contribution from the Town. He read <br />a letter which he drafted to Itiir. Trask on this subject. The corp- <br />oration will expect the Town to cooperate with diem in the matter <br />of expense, because there are three men who are Lexington citizens <br />on their list. The rate of pay is $12.50 per week. This money would <br />have to be taken out of the Welfare Fund. <br />viir. 1,1ilne stated that he thought the Board should make a Emergency <br />decision on some definite object it wants done and finished. T;r. Planning <br />Cosgrove said. he thought the work in connection with the extension Researc <br />of the sewer system starting at the Arlington Reservoir was important Corp. <br />and they needed topographical maps which were made by going out over <br />the work. <br />Mr. IvAlne also presented a letter which he wrote to the Select- <br />men in regard to the matter in question and the Board voted to accept <br />it. <br />The Towp Engineer presented the Board with copies of "Sewers <br />& Assessments for discussion, he stated that he thought the rate <br />sewer assessment was too low and that he would like to see the assess- <br />ment 100`a instead of 509/o. It would be better to assess 100% on Sewer <br />lateral sewers than 50"0 on trunk lines and laterals as is now being Assess - <br />done . mo nt s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.