1932-06-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

-4 - He said he had toile(? iii several cars from, the street and as there was no room for them. inside, he has to keep them in the back yard because he is using parts fi.om them. The place is not a fire hazard because he is inspeci;eil every .-so often by the Fire Depart- ment. Lie tried an experiment on the chimney and it broke, but it was to ,en down es soon as the snow and ice cleared off. 3e took the top off the chimney but it has not been rebuilt except to rut sp!'L, In concrete slab. lh se buildings h� r) -o- t'zer, "ot• 120 peol)le oppo:iinL the c' u: gP '<-new this before they -ln. pro; ._tcsii never be used for anything else and. ,s ;;proteclio_L it for the build' ngs . He wEints to beautify the place by planting shrubs. The expanse of his business is not gasoiin- but is i- vair•i.ng. The Cn.airr.:an instructec% Yr. Perkins to supply the Planning Boar°r.? ithin the geek and not le.ter than a vreelr from date of 1e1:rinr;, a duplicate petition signed by the owners of 50% in value of t'ne property from 430 t -o 664 avenue inclusive, and Cak StresA to an", ineluc ing the prop-rty of Yr. Nichols and corresponding property opposite. TVlne asked if the peoile present would oppose if permission were g.iven ,.r. Perkins to alter and repair his building without charging Lhe Loving. ,Ir. G'Connell stated th,�t if that is the intention of Yr. Per•kiiis, ii; is not necessary to coire before [,he Planning Board I ut ,.hould_ be handled by the Board of Appeals. These buildings can be kept in repair. .,jr. zlgnotti asked what restrictions the Town would put on Yr. Perkins and things he should file a plan showing his proposed iniorol erents . PUr. StandbviOlEe stated that he did not; think the people would oppose the renor,ation of the buildings unless he got in a r'aich e-,paxtded place. he Chairman informed irx•. Perkins that if said list of pr•o1r rtv o%°rn_:rs rva.s not furnished v;ithin the next week, the petition woulc be autor:atically thrown out and that only after the above-mentioned list is received can the Planning Board con- sider the merits of the hearing. The hearing was declaraC closed at 9:45 P. 14, Respectfully submitted., Clerk 1