|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1924-05-16
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1920-1929
>
1924
>
1924-05-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:07:25 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:15:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 16, 19240 <br />PLANNING BOARD MEETING. <br />The regular meeting; of the PlanniBoard was .held in Carp <br />Hall on Friday ay.ning, May 16, at 775 o'clock; there being <br />present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, L.S. and W.D. Brown and Town <br />Engineer French. <br />MINTER STREET & <br />GRISWOLD DEVELOPMENT. <br />In response to the efforts of-Mr. Griswold there <br />appearid before the Board the 8bllowing`land+owners <br />along that portion of Winter Street affected by the <br />proposed park Land'Developkent;! . <br />Messrs. Mahoney, Haynes, Welch, Streckroski, tem <br />gather with Mr, Griswold and his`Engineer,'Mr. Bella• <br />MY* <br />The Chairman explains that the conference in in <br />the nature of a get-to•getherF meeting to see if with <br />the c000peration of the property owners, a development , <br />of Winter Street may not be "arrived at which, by -tho <br />avoidance of exeessive"grades, will meet with the`ap-', <br />proval of the townspeople and be to the mutual advantage a& i <br />of all. <br />Mr. `Haynes and Up, Welch suggest a slight change in <br />the course of the street whereby their properties will <br />be left practically uninjured. <br />Mr. Stookr©ski objects to the loss of certain of his <br />front lands, reclaimed by his "own personal efforts; but <br />it is pointed out that any considerable shift in his <br />favor will work to the corresponding injury of Mr. Lax" <br />nor across the street.'' <br />He also objects to the proposed future streets across <br />his property, preferring, instead, an- extension of a <br />street laid down by the R.R"Park developers and which <br />running` adjacent to his property would continue along'a <br />narrow piece of land now owned by him. It was 'pointed <br />out that the streets as proposed would be to his ulti- <br />mate advantage if he ever decided to put his property <br />In the market; but until such time arrived he would not <br />be affected thereby. <br />Mr. Mahoney objects to the lay-out inasmuch as; it <br />takes a 50 foot strip completely across one end of his <br />property leaving a plot of a little over one acre segrs- <br />gated, when the street is actually built, from the bal- <br />anee of his property, which comprises altogether, at the <br />present times from 10 to 11 acres. <br />He has no desire to develops his land for residences <br />having bought it for a'farm, for which he needs his pres- <br />ent acreage and claiming it impossible to purchase more <br />adjoining. <br />He does not care to commit himself, however, at this <br />time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.