2018-04-11-CEC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Y Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting April 11, 2018 APRIL 19'" �d N4i„'47�r Location and Time: Cary Memorial Building, Robbins Room; 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Charles Lamb, Chair; David Kanter, Vice-Chair & Clerk; Sandy Beebee; Wendy Manz; Frank Smith Member Absent: Rod Cole Others Present: None Documents Presented: • Notice of CEC Meeting, April 11, 2018 • Update, April 11, 2018, on Article 25, Rescind Prior Borrowing Authority, for inclusion in Pending Draft #5 of Updates to & Errata in CEC Report to the 2018 Annual Town Meeting (ATM) • Draft of CEC Spoken Report, April 10, 2018, to 2018 ATM Regarding Article 20(f), Community Center Expansion—Design • Conceptual-Stage Project Costs for Lexington Community Center (LexCC) Expansion (DiNisco Design Partnership Presentation to the Board of Selectmen, January 8, 2018, Page 34 of 37) • Draft Minutes of CEC Meeting, April 9, 2018 Call to Order: Mr. Lamb called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Discussion of matters related to the 2018 ATM, this Committee's Report to that ATM, and the Town's Capital Program execution and planning • Mr. Kanter advised the Committee that the Motion under Article 25, Rescind Prior Borrowing Authority, had been received and the list of the rescissions vary from those that this Committee had voted unanimously to recommend approval. It was Moved and Seconded to recommend approval of the new list of rescissions and their dollar amounts. Vote: 5-0 • Based on that vote, it was Moved and Seconded to include the update for Article 25 that had been proposed to be added to the pending Updates/Errata publication. Vote: 5-0 • Mr. Lamb asked the members for their opinions on the draft he had prepared for the comments to be spoken when this Committee's position was requested by the Moderator on Article 20(f), Community Center Expansion—Design. As background, he cited that this Committee's current position on that matter is unanimously to recommend disapproval of the proposed funding to being the project from Concept through Schematic Design. o All members: ■ Affirmed that their positions have not changed, ■ Agreed that not only were all the points made in the draft valid, but that those points were consistent with the basis for their vote to recommend disapproval of the requested funding, Page 1 of 2