2018-04-09-CEC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Y Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting April 9, 2018 APRIL 1911 �IN4i„'47�r Location and Time: Cary Memorial Building, Robbins Room; 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Charles Lamb, Chair; David Kanter, Vice-Chair & Clerk; Sandy Beebee; Wendy Manz; Frank Smith Member Absent: Rod Cole Others Present: None Documents Presented: • Notice of CEC Meeting, April 9, 2018 • Draft #4 of Updates to & Errata in CEC Report to the 2018 Annual Town Meeting (ATM) • Draft Minutes of CEC Meeting, April 2, 2018 Call to Order: Mr. Lamb called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. Discussion of matters related to the 2018 ATM, this Committee's Report to that ATM, and the Town's Capital Program execution and planning—including approval of a draft of an Updates/Errata publication to that Report • Mr. Kanter advised the Committee of the decision earlier today by the Board of Selectmen (BoS) to revise its position on Article 11, Westview Cemetery Building Construction, to be to Move for Indefinite Postponement (IP). As this Committee had been unanimously opposed to funding that construction, it was Moved and Seconded now to recommend approval of IP for that Article 11. Vote:5-0 • The Committee discussed the Draft #4 Updates/Errata publication—with emphasis on the supplemental text proposed to be the replacement under Article 22, Visitors Center, to what was in that Report. That draft replacement was based on the spoken report the Chair had given to the ATM when that Article was debated. It was Moved and Seconded to approve that Draft #4 publication with the Chair and Vice—Chair authorized to make any non-substantive changes. Vote: 5-0 • The Committee addressed that with the new position on Article 11, now the only remaining Committee difference of Disapprove in our Report is with regard to Article 20(f), Community Center Campus Expansion—for which this Committee is unanimously opposed to any funding. While there is no indication at this time that that sub-Article would be presented as being Moved for IP, as just done with regard to such a change for Article 11, this Committee agreed to be on record about what is its position if Article 20(f) were Moved for IP. It was Moved and Seconded that if Article 20(f) were to be Moved for IP, this Committee would recommend approval of I P. Vote: 5-0 • In light of the last vote, it was Moved and Seconded that if Article 20(f) is to be Moved for IP before the last opportunity to have the Updates/Errata publication received and placed on file at this Annual Town Meeting, adding that change in this Committee's position on Article 20(f) is approved for inclusion in that publication. Vote: 5-0 Page 1 of 2