Laserfiche WebLink
TOWN OF LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS <br /> CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br /> MINUTES <br /> Monday November 13, 2017 <br /> 6:30 P.M. <br /> Parker Room, Town Office Building <br /> 1625 Massachusetts Ave <br /> Vice Chair David Langseth opened the meeting at 6:32pm in the Parker Room. <br /> Commissioners Present: Duke Bitsko, Dick Wolk, Kevin Beuttell, Ruth Ladd, Alex Dohan. <br /> David Langseth <br /> Others present: Karen Mullins, Conservation Administrator and Casey Hagerty, Conservation <br /> Department Assistant <br /> 6:32pm <br /> Approve insignificant plan change: 288 Concord Ave, DEP 201-1045, BL 1002 <br /> Dan Carr, Stamski and McNary, explained that as the contractor was getting ready to install the <br /> drywells, he realized that they were going to have issues getting the necessary separation with <br /> the groundwater. They are proposing to use a different type of chamber so that they can achieve <br /> the correct separation. <br /> Mr. Langseth entered the engineering report into the record. <br /> Motion to approve the plan change made by Mr. Wolk and seconded by Ms. Dohan. Vote: 6-0 in <br /> favor. <br /> 6:36pm <br /> Request for Amendment Determination: 45-65 Hayden Ave, DEP 201-1044, BL 1001 <br /> Doug Hartnett, High Point Engineering, explained that during construction of the parking lot <br /> expansion, they discovered a few issues that they want to address under the current Order of <br /> Conditions. The first, is that they need to do some additional material removal in the stream <br /> channel in order to get more positive flow characteristics. The second, is that they discovered a <br /> damaged culvert on the property. They are proposing to install a three sided box culvert that <br /> would improve the quality of the stream crossing. Mr. Hartnett stated that they are asking the <br /> commission whether this project could be considered an amendment to the permit or would need <br /> an entirely new filing. <br /> Questions and comments from the Commission: <br /> The commission stated that they felt the additional dredging could be heard as an amendment, <br /> but the culvert may need to be a new filing. <br />