1974-10-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

[I I October 24, 1974 hearings (continued) -2 boundary from 100 ft. to 0 ft., and (6) rear yard adjacent to a district boundary from 100 ft. to 30 ft.; also variances from Sec. 32.2 (Schedule of Restrictions for Parking and Loading) to reduce the required distance from the parking area to the street line from 50 ft. to 40 ft. and to reduce the required distances from the parking area to district boundary lines from 50 ft. to 0 ft. and 30 ft. Following the hearings the Board gave further consideration to the subject of all petitions, the evidence presented by the petitioners and others and the reports and letters received, including the letters from other town boards and officials and made the following decisions, all in public open meeting: Sun Valley Association - granted unanimously. Auto Engineering, Inc. - granted unanimously. Area Realty Trust - decision deferred, adjourned meeting to be held Sat., 10/26/74. Spring Street Trust - decision deferred, It it " if it " It All pertinent material is on file in the Board of Appeals' office. The meeting adjourned at 11:45 to be continued Saturday, October 26, 8:30 a.m. 0 , \�X a Evelyn F. Cole, Clerk October 26, 1974 g_3° a=`� On Saturday, October 26, 1974, in open public meeting, notice having been posted with the Town Clerk, the Board gave further consideration to the subject of the Area Realty Trust petition, the evidence presented by the Petitioner and others at the hearing and the reports and letters received, including the letters from other town boards and officials and voted 4 to 1 to deny the petition, the Chairman voting in favor. One reason was given for the denial: The use pro- posed by the Petitioner is not in keeping with the existing uses in the CR zone along Hayden Avenue. Also, the Board gave considerable consideration to the subject of the Spring Street Trust petition, deliberating on all matters, and voted 3 to 2 in favor of the following findings: The Board finds that the area is too small for the build- ing and the number and size of the variances requested are prohibitive. Mr. Brod- head made the motion to grant the petition and Mrs. Riffin seconded the motion. The motion did not carry, two voting in favor, three in opposition. In Favor: Mr. Brodhead and Mr. Nickerson. In Opposition: Mrs. Riffin, Mrs. Morey and Dr. Wadsworth. The meeting adjourned at 11 a.m. l a& Evelyn F. Cole, Clerk