Laserfiche WebLink
ISoule: <br />Joint Meeting with Planning Board <br />November 214, 1961 <br />We are here to try to get an understanding on what areas of trespass we <br />are making on each other. <br />Nickerson: Will you consider Patricia Terrace first? <br />Soule: O.K. (Reads letter of 10/10/61 to Board of Appeals from Planning Board) <br />There seems to be two areas here. -.One is frontage and street. <br />Nickerson: <br />I think the reason we have delayed our decision is to see if Harold can <br />advise us of any more economical way of doing this without creating so <br />much expense that the lot won't bring that much in return. * felt that <br />this was a piece of land isolated beyond any use. If so much money had <br />to be spent they wouldn't do it. <br />Stevens: <br />This goes back to the question of whether or not it is a subdivision. <br />It comes within the definition of subdivision, It comes before you to <br />apparently grant a variance of the by-law. It vests in the Board of Appeals <br />power to grant variances. That doeantt involve right to grant variances <br />from the control law. Some years ago we got into a discussion about how <br />you would know which.was which when they came before you. I suggested <br />that in all cases where you are presented with a plan and asked to act on <br />it that you not grant that until the plan was endorsed in some way by the <br />Planning Board. I had thought that that was followed. Then later it was <br />my understanding that the Planning Board didn't want it that way. I have <br />told them that was very confusing. <br />Mayers <br />A subdivision is the division.of a parcel of land into two or more parcels <br />where one doesn't have frontage or doesn't face on an accepted way. As <br />the zoning Board of Appeal you have a right to grant lots that have <br />insufficient frontage or area, As the sub control board of appeal you <br />have the right to grant on an unaccepted way. If a plan comes in here and <br />divides a piece of property where the frontage is in right it is a sub- <br />division. You just get a variance on a frontage. Can we rule that it <br />would not be a subdivision if the person gets a variance from the Board <br />of Appeals? <br />Souls: <br />Eben after the Board of Appeals has granted a variance? <br />Stevens: <br />We are talkingabout before -hand. <br />Nickerson: What do we do when they are pushed to us by the Planning Board? They come <br />down here to the Planning Board. The Planning Board sends them to us. <br />Stevens: If they are going to operate on that basis they have to abide by what you do. <br />Mabae: We have been incansistent. <br />Nickerson: On the Patricia Terrace deal ... unless the Planning Board puts its stamp of <br />approval on this we can't act on it. <br />Stevens: It is a subdivision. The Maloney thing was a lot. This is different. <br />This is a large tract of land at the and of this so-called etreet. They <br />want two lots. They have got to go to the Planning Board to have a <br />subdivision approved: There has to be a hearing by the Planning Board <br />