Laserfiche WebLink
243 <br />' <br />BOARD OF APPALS MEETING <br />November 27, 1936. <br />A meeting of the board of -appeals was held in the <br />Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, Lexington, at 7:30 <br />P. M. Chairman Maddison and Messrs. Glynn and Ferguson, <br />and Associate I/.ember John A. Lyons were present. The Secre- <br />tary was also present. <br />Mr. L. J. O'Connell appeared before the Board. <br />the Chairman informed Mr. O'Connell that the Board <br />had discussed his petition for a gasoline station and that <br />there was a divided opinion on the matter, so the Board <br />thought it would be a good idea to have him come before it <br />again to see if he had had any plans drawn, and to see if <br />he was willing to forego any other business on the lot if <br />he was given the gasoline permit. The Chairman asked him <br />if he had any further ideas as to the gas station. <br />O'Connell said that his ideas were the same. <br />He thought that if the whole tract of land was given to any <br />' one company that the land in back of.the station would pro- <br />bably be a dump. He submitted a rough sketch of the station <br />planned and said that greasing pits, etc. would all be under <br />cover. <br />Mr. Glynn asked Iti`r. O'Connell if he had had the <br />plot laid out in any particular way. He replied that he was <br />figuring on a lot for the gas station having 106' frontage <br />on Woburn Street, 90' frontage on Fletcher Ave., and about <br />60' deep, giving the lot 7628'. The original plan had a <br />grass plot between the gas station and the stores. O'Connell <br />stated that he would like to restore the old house on Woburn <br />Street and take the store out. He would like to erect a <br />small block of three stores on this lot in question, near <br />the railroad track on Woburn Street, and would like to erect <br />a small bungalow in the rear of the gas station. <br />Mr. Glynn told Mr. O'Connell that this was a type <br />of spot zoning, and that some of the members thought that <br />the owners of residential property needed some protection. <br />He said that there was a question as to whether or not a <br />gasoline station was needed, but it might be that general <br />stores would not be particularly nice to look at, as they. <br />are not always kept 'very neat. Consequently the question <br />Is raised as to whether or not the Board might feel itself <br />disposed to grant whatever it considered the lesser of the <br />two evils; a gas station, nicely kept, or a block of stores. <br />1 <br />