Laserfiche WebLink
233 <br />' BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING <br />November 18, 1936. <br />A meeting of the Board of Appeals was held in the <br />Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, at 7:30 P. M. <br />Chairman Maddison, Messrs. Glynn, Kimball, Robbins and <br />Ferguson were present. The Secretary was also present. <br />The matter of the petition of Charles W. Ryder for <br />permission to maintain a convalescent home at 84 Cary <br />Avenue was considered and also the statements of Mr. Ryder <br />to the effect that they had owned this property for a <br />considerable length of time and had been unable to rent <br />the same for a private residence owing to its size, and <br />the Board also considered the reports which had been <br />received regarding the prospective tenant. The almost <br />unanimous feeling of the neighbors against the granting <br />of the petition was also carefully considered. . <br />Upon motion of Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Glynn, <br />' it was unanimously voted to deny the petition in the <br />following form: <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws, Chapter <br />40, section 27, having received a written petition <br />addressed to it by Charles W. Ryder, a copy of which is <br />hereto annexed, held a public hearing thereon of which <br />notice was mailed to the petitioner and to the owners of <br />all property deemed by the Board to be affected thereby <br />as they appear on the most recent local tax list, and <br />also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man, a newspaper <br />published in Lexington, which hearing was held in the <br />Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office Building on October <br />30, 1936 and November 6, 1936. <br />Four members of the Board of Appeals were present at <br />the hearing. A certificate of notice is hereto annexed. <br />At this hearing evidence was offered on behalfcf the peti- <br />tioner tending to show: <br />That he had had an application to lease 84 Cary Avenue <br />to be used for a convalescent home and also as a residence <br />by the proposed tenant, Mrs. Gladys Lussier; that the owner <br />had been unable to find a customer to either purchase or <br />occupy the premises as a residence; that Mrs. Lussier had <br />had previous experience in running a sanitorium at Enosburg <br />Falls, Vt. Mrs. Lussier also stated that many of her <br />patients in Vermont came from the Leahy clinic in Boston; <br />that she was a registered nurse in Vermont and did not desire <br />to take any patients who would naturally be objectionable <br />to her family; that she was willing to agree not to take any <br />contagious, psychopathic, tuberculor, alcoholic or narcotic <br />patients, and was willing to limit the number of patients <br />k£ any one time to ten. <br />