Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />BOARD OF--APPEALS-MEETING <br />' MARCH 2nd, 1934. <br />A meeting of the Board of Appeals was held at the Select- <br />men's Room, Town Office Building, at 8 o'clock P.M. Messrs. <br />Maddison, Glynn, Baldrey, Ferguson and Robbins were present. <br />The Secretary was also present. <br />The Chairman reported that he had taken up with the Town <br />Counsel the form used by the Board in allowing or denying <br />applications for appeals, and it was voted that the changes <br />suggested in paragraph four be made in future forms. <br />Hearing was advertised on the application of Ralph H. Wells <br />to maintain a physician's office at 1430 Mass. Avenue to be <br />held at 8 o'clock. Dr. Wells not being present at that time, <br />it was decided to call the hearing of Robbins and Smith for <br />permission to maintain a sign on the property owned by Robbins <br />and Smith located on Mass. Avenue between numbers 981 to 1003. <br />Hearing was called at 8:15 P. -A. and the Clerk of the <br />Board read the notice of the hearing published in the Lexington <br />Minute -Man on February 15th. <br />Mr. James R. Smith appeared at the hearing representing <br />Robbins and Smith and stated that Mr. Robbins was in Florida <br />and requested him to take care of the matter. He stated <br />that they were desirous of maintaining the sign and that <br />they find that it is absolutely necessary to have the sign. <br />It would be impossible to get the people in there to pur- <br />chase land unless they have some sort of a sign. They <br />were willing to cooperate with the Town as to the size of <br />the sign if there is any criticism of the present sign and <br />they would be glad to do anything within reason that the <br />Board desired. They owned the property on the Avenue and <br />it did not seem that any other property was affected by the <br />sign, and the sign directs the public to the development <br />on the other side of Mass. Avenue in the Locust Avenue section. <br />Mr. Maddison explained that he did not know just how <br />the Board would be able to grant relief under the Zoning Law <br />inasmuch as Section 5 of R.l Districts states that "Real <br />estate signs of not over six square feet in area advertising <br />the sale or rental of only the premises on which they are <br />located, and bulletin boards, and/or signs accessory to uses <br />specified in paragraphs 3, 4 and 6 under R.1 districts; but <br />in single sub -divisions large signs may be erected but subject <br />to the provisions of Section 9." <br />The question arose therefore how this sign could <br />advertise the property at the Locust Avenue -section when <br />it was not part of the development it advertised. <br />Mr. Smith stated that they intended to develop the <br />property on Mass. Avenue and that the same was for sale, <br />but that they had not made a layout there owing to the fact <br />that they felt they should get rid of some of the other <br />property first. They own no other land beside this plot <br />on the southerly side of Mass. Avenue. <br />