|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1940-01-03
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Select Board-SB (formerly Selectmen, Board of-BOS)
>
Minutes
>
1940-1949
>
1940
>
1940-01-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2018 12:01:00 PM
Creation date
1/19/2018 12:00:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Selectmen
Keywords or Subject
BOS, Selectmen Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
573 <br />' SELECTMEN'S MEETING <br />Jan, 3rd, 1940. <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held in <br />the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, at 7:30 P.M. <br />Chairman Giroux, Messrs, Potter, Rowse, Locke and Sarano were <br />present. The Clerk was also present. <br />At 7:30 P.M. Mr, John W. Raymond, Jr., Supt. of Public Works, <br />Mr. E.A. Lindstrom, Plumbing Inspector, and the following <br />plumbers appeared: Mr. Charles E. Collins, Lester Andrews, <br />Vernon C. Page and William A. Coakley. <br />"The Chairman informed the group that the meeting had been <br />called to discuss a proposed change in the charges for permits <br />.He stated that the Selectmen did not want the plumbers to get Plumbing <br />thb idea that the Board wanted to make it difficult for any charges. <br />of them and were not picking on them or any other group. He <br />said if this Board or other Boards were negligent in not es- <br />tablishing charges that conformed with those in other communities, <br />then the matter should be rectified as soon as possible. He <br />said the Selectmen had been considering making some specific <br />charges for alterations or replacements of plumbing fixtures. <br />The Chairman said the following fees had been suggested: <br />New Construction,: The base charge for a plumbing permit shall <br />e §2*00 plus 25� per fixture and 25¢ for each future <br />fixture connection or appliance. <br />Alteration Replacement: The-nbase charge for a plumbing permit <br />shall e ,00 plus 25 cents per fixture and 25cents <br />for each future fixture connection or appliance. <br />Mr. Page said that this would add considerable to the <br />permit costs. The present rate is $2.00 with no charge for extra <br />fixtures. One replacement would cost $1.25 where it costs <br />nothing now. He thought this would add to the burden on the <br />plumbers and that all the taxpayers would not have to share <br />the burden. Page said he was not in favor of having any <br />charges. <br />Mr. Lindstrom said that if he issued a permit for two <br />fixtures in the future it would cost $1900 and under the present <br />system it cost $1.25, <br />Mr. Andrews said that on a new house with five fixtures <br />the charge would be 03.25. He thought that Lexington needed <br />something so that the Plumbing Inspector could check up on <br />outsiders doing work here. He said he knew in times past, <br />work had been done by outsiders where no permit had been <br />taken out. He said that if a plumber saw that some fixtures <br />had been replaced, he could check up with the Plumbing <br />Inspector to see if a permit had been taken out. <br />Mr. Lindstrom pointed out that the change would make it <br />' cost less for replacements than it does now. <br />Mr. Potter asked what a fixture connection was, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.