Laserfiche WebLink
346 <br />the insurance bureau. He said that was supported by <br />voluntary subscriptions. <br />' <br />Mr. Potter asked if Valentine knew any towns that <br />invested in mutual companies and he said that Plymouth <br />placed one-half of its insurance with mutual companies. <br />The Town voted on it and agreed to that. Mr. Valentine <br />said he came in to ask for a chance to place the insurance <br />with a stock group. <br />The Chairman told him that the Board would discuss the <br />matter and he retired. <br />The Town Counsel appeared before the Board. The Chairman <br />explained the matter to him and said that there was some <br />question as to the Board's right to place the insurance.in <br />mutual companies without..authority of the Town Meeting. Mr. <br />Wrightington said he could see the point, but had never <br />looked into the matter but would do sound advise the Board. <br />Mr. Rowse moved that the Board make no change in its <br />vote of last week to have the two insurance policies placed <br />in mutual companies through Mr. Valentine. Mr. Sarano <br />seconded the motion and it was so voted. <br />Mr. Rowse moved that an article be inserted in the <br />i <br />Warrant for the next town meeting to see if the town will <br />Article. <br />authorize the Selectmen to place not exceeding 50% of the <br />total fire insurance on town properties with mutual compan- <br />ies. Mr. Locke sedonded the motion and it was so voted. <br />Messrs. Lindstrom and Raymond appeared before the <br />' <br />Board relative to the proposed plumbing regulations. Mr. <br />Lindstrom said there was a question regarding outside <br />grease traps to be used when a septic tank or cesspool was <br />being installed. He said that these outside grease -.,traps <br />had been used in Weston and in New Jerseyand these places <br />have had no trouble with grease,getting into the septic tank <br />Plumbing <br />or cesspool. He said that he had that incorporated in the <br />Laws, <br />proposed laws, but when the plumbers came in they objected <br />to it so the clause was removed. He requested that the clause <br />be left in. The Chairman asked how much additional this -would <br />cost and Mr. Lindstrom said it would be $50.00 and would <br />apply to new systems only. The objection was that that it <br />would cost the speculative builder too much money$ The <br />Chairman asked how the committee stood on it, and Mr. Ray- <br />mond said that three of the members were in favor of it <br />and one was opposed. He said that when the question first <br />came up the committee stood 50-50 on It. Mr. Poole and <br />Mr. Ferguson were opposed, but later on Mr. Poole declared <br />that he favored it strongly. He said that he was not sure <br />that that fact was ever brought•to Mr. Ferguson's attention. <br />The Chairman suggested that the clause be left in with the <br />understanding that the item•would be pointed out to the <br />Town Meeting Members so that it could be discussed. Mr. <br />Raymond said that if it was not pointed out, the plumbers <br />' <br />would feel that something had been put over on them. The <br />Clerk was instructed to advise the plumbers that the clause <br />I. <br />