Laserfiche WebLink
412 <br />cesspool is overflowing now and he cannot dig any more as <br />there is a ledge down about four feet. Mr. John F. Anderson <br />of 45 Banks Avenue said he had a laundry and toilet in the <br />cellar and his cesspool always backed up into them. He <br />has to clean out the cesspool every spring. He said that <br />it filled up with water from Chase Avenue. Mr. Anderson <br />said that it was work that was done previously which <br />caused the water to flow onto his property abd not the work <br />that was being done now on Charles Street. Mr, C. E. <br />McIntosh of 60 Chase Avenue said that he had dug so much <br />he had no room for a garden except a m ck garden. The <br />condition is very bad at the present time. Mr. Clifford <br />said that there was no seepage in the ground there, that <br />most of it was blue gravel, <br />The following persons wished to be recorded as petition- <br />ers for sewerage in this section: A. M. Smith, 58 Oak <br />Street; P. J. Nary, 5 Bennett Avenue; J. S. McKenna, 81 Baker <br />Avenue; A. C. Pawlowski, 15 Bennett Avenue; John J. Anderson, <br />65 Bangs Avenue; C. H. Monto, 106 Oak Street; James Barnes, <br />60 Oak Street; C. H. McIntosh, 60 Chase Avenue; Frank <br />Serrilla, 61 Baker Avenue; George W. Parsons, 29 Chase Ave; <br />G. Ware, Carville Ave; Ernest W. Anderson, 26 Ames Ave; <br />A. W. Heywood, 69 Oak Street; Malcolm H. Clifford, 59 Chase <br />Avenue; David Kidd, 7 Butler Ave; C. E. McPhee, owning <br />property on Baker and Ames Avenues. <br />Mr. Kidd said that he had a septic tank but was <br />supporting this petition for the benefit of the others. <br />He said that the group thought this work might be done as <br />a W.P.A. project. <br />The Chairman asked if the group understood that they <br />would have to pay betterments on an extension and Mr, Kidd <br />replied in the affirmative. He said they understood that <br />and all agreed to it but they would prefer to have the job <br />done as a 11I.P.A. project. The Chairman asked Mr. Raymond <br />to explain how the betterment assessment was arrived at. <br />He replied that under the present system they pay 50% of <br />the figure which is based on the average cost of all street <br />sewers built during the previous five years and the town <br />pays the other 50%. A sewer might cost $15. a foot on <br />account of rock but it so happens that the figure today is <br />$8.50 and the property owner would have to pay one-half <br />of that or $4.25 per foot. Mr. Raymond said he was not sure <br />that the town could get a W.P.A. project approved for this <br />work but he did have some encouragement from the W.P.A. <br />administrator if the town could show that the streets were <br />dedicated to public use. Work could be done on accepted <br />streets but there might be difficulty with unaccepted streets. <br />The Chairman asked what chances there would be of having <br />the work done under the P.W.A. Mr. Raymond said he had <br />a notice from the P.W. A. engineer last week stating that <br />there was little likelihood that any projects would be con- <br />sidered unless they were submitted before August lst. He <br />said it was an impossibility to do the engineering work <br />necessary for this project and submit it before that date. <br />Mr. Raymond said that the work should be considered as a <br />1 <br />