Laserfiche WebLink
Parking <br />census. <br />Hauck <br />water <br />guaranty. <br />SELECTMEN'S MEETING <br />MAY 7, 1935. <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held <br />in the Selectmen's Room, Town Offices, at 7:30 P.M. <br />Messrs. Ferguson, Gilcreast, Lyons, and Potter were present. <br />The Clerk was also present. <br />Mr. Roland Greeley, representing the Planning Board, <br />appeared before the Board in regard to making an ERA project <br />of a parking survey in the center of the Town. He stated <br />that the purpose of the project was to obtain conclusive <br />data as to whether there is a parking problem in Lexington <br />center, and to obtain necessary survey in case such a <br />problem presents itself to be solved. Mr. Greeley <br />presented a suggested time sheet for the survey, and stated <br />that the Planning Board thought that if two ERA men were m- <br />ployed twenty-four hours a week that they could do the work <br />satisfactorily in one week. It was duly moved and seconded <br />that the matter be turned over to the Local ERA administrattor. <br />Mr. Carl Hauck appeared before the Board in regard to <br />a letter which he had received from the Town Counsel on <br />his outstanding water guaranty account in the amount of <br />$585.45. Mr. Hauck had talked with Mr. Wrightington, who <br />suggested that he appear before the Board. Dir. Hauck <br />fully acknowledged responsibility for the debt, and stated <br />that he intended to pay the bill when he was financially <br />able to, but that he could not do so at the present time. <br />He has not earned any money for the past two years, and <br />feels that he will soon have to ask the Town for aid. <br />Mr. Hauck paid the.first three years' guaranty, but did <br />not pay any more inasmuch as he thought it unfair for him <br />to pay it when the other guarantors were not doing so. <br />Mr. Hauck had talked with Mr. Scamman before the water <br />main extension was made, and Mr. Scamman informed him that <br />the charge would be made on an average cost per foot for <br />the year basis, or in other words, that the charge for the <br />water guaranty would be on practically the,same basis as <br />a sewer assessment charge. He stated that he had called <br />at the Water Dept. office about every year in regard to <br />the matter, and that Mr. Ross agreed with him in regard to <br />the unfairness of his paying the bill when the other <br />guarantors were not. <br />The Board advised Mr. Hauck to advise the Board in <br />writing just how he felt in regard to the matter, and <br />that action would be taken upon receipt of the letter. <br />Letter was received froze Louise M. Hannaford in <br />Hannaford which she stated that she had received a letter from the <br />water Town Counsel on her outstanding water guaranty amounting <br />guaranty. to $22.44. She requested that she be granted an extension <br />of time until July 1st in which to pay the bill, and the <br />Board voted to grant her request. <br />n <br />