|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1934-01-23
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Select Board-SB (formerly Selectmen, Board of-BOS)
>
Minutes
>
1930-1939
>
1934
>
1934-01-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2018 4:31:43 PM
Creation date
1/18/2018 4:31:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Selectmen
Keywords or Subject
BOS, Selectmen Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' SELECTMEN'S MERTING <br />JANUARY 23, 1934. <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held <br />at'the Selectmen's Rocm, Town Office Building, on Tuesday, <br />January 23, 19349 at 7:30 P.M. Messrs. Trask, Ferguson, <br />Gilcreast, Lyons and O'Connell were present. The Clerk <br />was also present. <br />1 <br />1 <br />At the request of the Board of Selectmen the Board <br />of Assessors came before them to discuss the matter of re- <br />valuation of preperty. <br />The Chairman explained that it was not within the pro- <br />vince of the Selectmen to dictate to the Board of Assessors, <br />but the Selectmen must have the expenditures of the town <br />and the tav -Rte in mind when appropriations are made, and <br />therefore d,asired to get the opinion as to whether or not <br />any revaluation is to be made. <br />The suggestion of reducing the buildings 10% was dis- <br />cussed and the Board of Assessors stated that this would <br />reduce the rate $2.00 and they felt that a reduction should <br />be made in the whole piece of property rather than on the <br />buildings. Mr. Potter state_ that an entire revaluation <br />would be a stupendous job. He stated that the assessors <br />have abated about $150.000 on requests and that the new <br />M n <br />Revaluaton <br />of prope ty <br />building valuations have just about offset that amount. 250 <br />requests for abatements have been received and there are 4113 <br />tax payers and 2489 houses in the town that are assessed. <br />Mr. Buc'.rley felt that it would not be well to have <br />word around that the Board of Assessors were to make a gen- <br />eral reduction of 100, and he felt that a great many houses <br />should have the asc,essment increased as they have never been <br />touched. <br />A great many people are now making requests to the <br />Board of Tax Appeals and most always secure an abatement. <br />Mr. Slocum expressed the idea that those who are ag- <br />grieved by their assessment have the opportunity to request <br />an abatement, and apparently the others who pay their taxes <br />f are satisfied. He felt that some adjustment should be made <br />but wondered if it wasn't t* best way to continue in the <br />manner that is now being done. <br />The question of an appraisal of the ,ntire town was <br />discussed. Mr. Gilcreast called attention to appraisals <br />made by Henderson & Ross. Other members of the Board were <br />of the opinion that local men knew the conditions and could <br />make a better appraisal. <br />Mr. Buckley called attention to the fact that the <br />block plan should be continued as it is of tremendous value <br />to the Assessors. <br />Attention was called to the fact that Rubin & Seligman <br />have employed Mr. Custance to survey their property and it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.