Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR NFETING, YAY 22, 1928 <br />C7 <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held at <br />the Selectmen's Office at 7:30 P.{. Messrs. Burnham, <br />Custance, Ballard, Robertson, and 'hamberlain were present. <br />Private hearing was declared open upon an appeal of Arley <br />A. Burgess to the decision of the Building Inspector of the use <br />of an elevator constructed by Mr. Burgess. <br />Mr. Burgess appeared before the Board with his attorney, <br />Mr. Thompson. Sydney R. Wrightington, Town Counsel. was also <br />present. The Attorney explained that the Elevator was erected <br />without any roof over the same and was perpendicular with the side <br />of the building. It was not connected with the building except <br />at the top where the material dnbps into a mixer, thereby <br />avoiding hand work which was formerly done, and to keep pace with <br />the cement block business. Mr. Burgess was advised to do this <br />to make the work economical. The building was not altered in order <br />to construct this elevator which was covered with sheet iron and <br />located about two feet from the building and was about twelve inches <br />wide one way and three or four feet the other way and about twenty- <br />two to twenty-four feet high. <br />Mr. Thompson did not contend that this elevator was in any way <br />a violation of the building law inasmuch as he did not consider it <br />an alteration of the structure and. only considered it a new means <br />of handling the mechanism of the block plant which was in existence <br />before the zoning law gent into effect. For this reason also, he did <br />not feel that there could be considered any complaint under the zoning <br />law inasmuch as the plant existed before that time. <br />Mr. Burgess stated that he felt that it would be expensive <br />for him to move the plant to the gravel plant, and that he did <br />not consider that he needed to increase his present plant mechanicles <br />for some time to come. <br />Mr. Burgess stated that he owned. 355 feet of land on 'Hebb Street <br />and 150 feet on Woburn Street, and the material he used in the <br />block plant comes from four or five acres he owns beyond. <br />The attorney decided that it appeared to be a matter of the* <br />interpretation of the building and zoning laws which is covered by <br />section four and seven of the building laws and section sixteen of <br />the zoning laws. <br />It was finally decided that inasmuch as theelevator was already <br />constructed, that 31r. Burgesa be allowed to operate the same for a <br />period of five weeks, and during that period. the Board would have <br />an opportunity to decide what action they would take, and at the <br />present time no decision was made except to allow Mr. Burgess to <br />operate for that period of time. <br />Commitment was signed for the water chares for the amount <br />of $1195.25 and for the Sewer Department for 9748.30. <br />In regard to the application of W. R. Warren' of Winchester <br />for a permit to install a gasoline tank at the corner of Bridge <br />Spring and Payson Streets, the Board voted to grant Mr. Warren <br />leave to withdraw his application and notified him that inasmuch ' <br />as the Board did not feel inclined to grant a permit for this <br />location, they did not feel it necessary to hold a hearing. <br />The application of Prendergast Brothers for a permit to <br />install a gasoline filling station at the corner of Massachusetts <br />Avenue and Fottler Avenue was again laid on the table foroneweek. <br />