Laserfiche WebLink
YEET11G, FEB. 19, 1923. <br />Levers. Scarman. _71ake and Burnham Present. <br />The Board signed the Warrant for the Annual ir_arch keeting, <br />to be held :'.arch 5, 1923. <br />+Villiam Roger Greeley and George A. earner were drawn as <br />Jurors. <br />Petition o -f the Edison Electric 111. Co. to attach to poles <br />of the N. 2. &. T. Go. on Lowell St. near Reed .Street was <br />granted. <br />1 <br />I <br />egal opinion war received from Town Counrel in which he <br />wrote as folloT+-,r: "I have your letter of February 14th, 1923. <br />requesting m�r opinion as to whetter or not the articles suggested <br />in Ir. bayleyls letter to the Board of ;selectmen unser date of <br />February 12th, 1923 would be the prover articles to clear up the <br />situation created b;; the action of the so-called 'By -Law Committeel <br />In my opinion they would not yelp the situation at all and I <br />euggert that t'ac following article be inverted in the warrant for <br />the hnnual sown 1.eetir.w whic'r. I understand v. -ill be closed at your <br />meeting tonight as the simplest and most effective method of ' <br />correcting the situation wideh in m-; o-ini_n is hoicelerPly in- <br />volved with illegalities and uncertainties .hich should not be <br />permitted to exint. <br />The article which I will euggert is 'To see if the Io -,n will <br />vote to rescind the so-called Code of y -Laws and all action re- <br />latin=g thereto taker. at the adjourned to M �-eetinwa held Junel9th, <br />27th, 28th, 1922, rerrectively.' <br />..:y further opinion, upon the queetione rained in ;your letter <br />of uanuary 30th, 1923 and in answer to rome o'f the pointe raised <br />by ."r. i-ayley in hie letters of January 31st, and .February 12th <br />respectively, 1 hope to hard to you to -morrow. " <br />Owing to the fact ti:•at 'dallace E. i Aller could not serve at <br />the Annual !.lection. !'red W. Butters was aprointed as a Teller <br />to take hie place. <br />Notice war received from mice Sraulinp statim: that her <br />duties were such th.-t rhe could not serve as iieT:uty Inspector <br />at the f.:arcr Election. <br />Common Victualle r' e License arae granted to 1.=re . i -i. K. Patch, <br />237 Mass. Ave., lexirf ton (cor. maple St. F. Is.a^n. 1tve.; <br />Legal opinion was received from ToM 'ounrel in which he <br />stated that he did not Pee any reason why a postal clerk could ' <br />not serve as a legirtrar of Voters owing to the fact that a <br />portal clerk is not an office 1,older as stated in Chapter 51, <br />Section 25 of the ueneral Laws. lhir ths,refor cualified Francis J <br />