Laserfiche WebLink
Working Group Memo — October 6, 2023 <br />This memo summarizes the results of the Lincoln Field Working Group's activities to develop <br />specifications for the resurfacing of Lincoln Field 1 and to establish an approach to address the needs for <br />functional performance, health and safety of users, and environmental impact for future capital projects. <br />The Working Group has agreed that the planned specifications are appropriate for the resurfacing of <br />Lincoln Field 1 and should be included in the bid package to be released this fall. <br />The Working Group came together to ensure that health, safety and environmental concerns associated <br />with artificial turf were considered along with the functional needs of fields at Lincoln Park. Working <br />Group members reviewed relevant literature collected by group members, visited fields that used <br />different technologies, and met with representatives from Brock USA and Town consultants (Activitas). <br />The results of this work have been captured in updates to the proposed specifications for the field. <br />Regarding the short-term need to establish specifications for the resurfacing of Lincoln Field 1, the <br />Working Group has helped to identify turf field components that satisfy the functional needs of the field <br />by using the best, currently available technologies to address concerns related to health, safety and <br />environmental impacts. The specifications call for: <br />• Infill: Brockfill (or similar) is specified - A wood particle infill specifically designed to improve <br />traction and reduce artificial turf heat. It is made from a species of southern pine grown, <br />harvested, and replanted in continuous cycles. <br />• Resilient Underlayment (Shock Pad): Brock SP -17 (or similar) is specified - A patented material <br />using polypropylene with a micro coating binder produces a material with an open pore <br />structure for fast drainage and a unique impact profile ideal for artificial turf. <br />• Disposal: Contractor shall provide a full, detailed accounting of the fate of removed turf <br />materials. Waste disposal via incineration or waste -to -energy is not permitted. So-called <br />'advanced recycling' or 'chemical recycling' are not forms of actual recycling and are not <br />permitted. <br />• Testing: Artificial turf [all the components] is manufactured in such a way that fluorinated <br />chemicals, including PFAS, are integral to the process. There are at least seven definitions <br />currently used to define per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). By defining and testing for <br />only the six PFAS that are currently regulated in Massachusetts, or even a few others, the <br />remaining thousands of PFAS are not accounted for. All PFAS contain organofluorine(s). By <br />using a screening method that identifies the group of chemicals that contain organofluorine, a <br />more complete assessment of the PFAS present in turf materials is obtained. Analytical test <br />results for total organofluorine and metals shall be submitted by vendors for informational <br />purposes to provide the Town with an indication of the levels of these chemicals in the turf <br />materials. <br />While these materials will increase/change some maintenance requirements and could affect field <br />playability during the particularly cold/wet times of the year, the Working Group's consensus was that <br />these potential impacts to athletic operations are acceptable given the health, safety and environmental <br />benefits of not using crumb rubber infill. <br />The materials used in turf fields and the approaches to manage and assess those materials are evolving <br />rapidly. The Working Group recommends that the Recreation Department integrate the evaluation of <br />project materials for health, safety and environmental impacts in all future capital projects. The Working <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />